ok heres my question. its critical but its constructive not corrosive
THIS IS THE BACKDROP OF THE QUESTION
im the last podcast, when you guys were discussing MW2, some guy said that it had and awesome STORY and it was worth the 60 bucks, and then there was some talk about the pakgamers writers/reviewers being better than those of the Ng4 or n4g or something, i personally dont visit those so i dont know the name, anyways this guy then goes on to say that the NO RUSSIAn mission was awesome/epic , and then this guy says than in that mission that villain is saying kill no russion, BUT when my brother was playing the game (i didnt play the game i think it sucks) i specifically watched that mission from start till the end including the breifing, and i think what that villian meant to say was DONOT SPEAK THE RUSSIAN LANGUAGE!! so that the locals dont recognise them and the blame goes to the americans , because they were in russia , it was a russian airport and he kills the player in the end and says now america has a pile of russian bodies at their feet, but i may be mistaken
HERE COMES THE question
what i want to ask is than if the supposed guy on your podcast dosent even know the story behind a game or dosent even take the time out to figure out the story of the game , how can he be qualified/allowed on the podcast to talk about the game especially if hes recommending ppl to buy the game just for the story saying it was totally worth it, worth the 5k? (i dont know his name but he was showing a lot of support for halo too)
i mean no disrespect , i have listened to all the podcasts , and i think you do an awesome job but stop criticizing other sites