read my post again... if you are on a budget then do not shift to an lcd/led... wasting money on cheap lcds is better than not buying it... i am using my head... thank you... and who told you that 20k lcds are good?? those are still bad and pathetic as you haven't seen real quality yet...There's something known as having a limited budget and getting the best in that. That's just what he did, use your head man. Anyone would know that 20K LCD's would better than 10K ones.
just sell the crappy shit and add some money and buy a better monitor...Thanks guys, but i dont really think i can claim warranty for 'not being satisfied with its results'. I need to make sure this is not how it should display results.
Anybody here who has this exact model?
Yea, I'm assuming the display drivers not to be installed on your PC by giving the quality that it already was.Yeah the receipt says 1 yr and the warranty card is attached to the box.
Well actually plugging the laptop display to the led made quite alot of difference. Could it be the graphic card too weak on my PC or just its drivers?. Its the on-board intel g31/33 ...on DG31PR.
And would using a DVI cable make any difference at all?
Thanks
I was talking about in comparison, of course a 20K LCD would support Full HD which would give much better quality then just HD (720p) resolution monitors.read my post again... if you are on a budget then do not shift to an lcd/led... wasting money on cheap lcds is better than not buying it... i am using my head... thank you... and who told you that 20k lcds are good?? those are still bad and pathetic as you haven't seen real quality yet...
His LCD isn't crappy, his input source just wasn't that good (having no driver's, hence no quality).just sell the crappy shit and add some money and buy a better monitor...
What should people on budget use then? CRT monitors? The age of CRT monitors is gone now. LCD/LED consume less power and cover lot less space. It is a matter of convenience.read my post again... if you are on a budget then do not shift to an lcd/led... wasting money on cheap lcds is better than not buying it...
And how much the real one cost? You think that everybody can afford them?i am using my head... thank you... and who told you that 20k lcds are good?? those are still bad and pathetic as you haven't seen real quality yet...
The display device is not at fault. The user is at fault here. Member Ali Man clarified you on this.just sell the crappy shit and add some money and buy a better monitor...
Its because MKV format's are usually Blu-Ray rip's giving a great HD kinda quality. Although a 700 DVDrip should also look good enough, but not the best. I can't see that how is a GPU upgrade how to do with your computers ram's i.e. DDR2You guys are taking this THOR dude too seriously just let him be lol.
Anyway i tried the lcd with and HP G62 and the results seemed fairly satisfactory to me. A high quality video ..4 gb mkv would show better on my lcd than the laptop, but a low res 700 dvdrip would look terrible on the lcd but fairly watchable on the laptop. Is that cuz of the screen size difference?
So its time for a GPU upgrade..suggestions please? dg31pr would support ddr2 i suppose?
And i say upgrade cuz grphic card drivers seem to be up to date as per intel website
you are right... i just boom and blastYou guys are taking this THOR dude too seriously just let him be lol.
there is a lot of difference in 20k and 29k....However, you are absolutely wrong if you think that none of the LCD/LED within 20 - 29k range are good.
You will not get much jump in quality. It will not be the same like from jumping from 10k range to 20 k range.there is a lot of difference in 20k and 29k....
Its because MKV format's are usually Blu-Ray rip's giving a great HD kinda quality. Although a 700 DVDrip should also look good enough, but not the best. I can't see that how is a GPU upgrade how to do with your computers ram's i.e. DDR2
And you should use the word update when mentioning drivers and not upgrade and this is usually used for hardware upgrades.
I can select native resolution, whats the screen size on your full hd screen?700MB DVD RIP LOOKS FIne even on my full hd screen, btw i used to have p5kpl-cm which is based on g31 chipset, watched hd movies and its good .. so is the chipset on your dg31 .. as i suggested have you tried reducing the contrast/brightness to 50% ?? and are you able to select native resolution of your led ?? if no then you need to upgrade drivers.
Actually DVDRips aren't that bad. I myself have tried them on Full HD quality, of course its not as good as Blu Ray rip's or Blu Ray itself, but its not that bad either (I think it varies from movie to movie).I dled a 14 gig Bluray of Avator and its a treat to the eyes! The reason why a dvd rip looks worse on it than on a 17 inch laptop screen, i think, is that 700 mb just cant pack enough pixels to be shown decently on a 20 inch screen..hence stretches the pixels..??
Thanks for the advice ( i never noticed the difference ) but in this case i did mean hardware upgrade..i need a better graphic card.. The drivers already are up to date.
And wouldnt i be restriced to Graphic cards with a certain architecture if i have a DDR2 supporting mother board ( As with rams). Or are all GPUs backwards and forward compatible?.. where do they go, PCI?
Already did that and yes there is a significant improvement in picture quality and richness of colors when connected with he laptop vga. ThanksMaybe try the led with the vga out of the laptop? or maybe you have tried that.
Actually DVDRips aren't that bad. I myself have tried them on Full HD quality, of course its not as good as Blu Ray rip's or Blu Ray itself, but its not that bad either (I think it varies from movie to movie).
According to the graphic card thing, you can even put the latest one on your DDR2 motherboard seeing that your motherboard has a PCIe x16 slot (Yes, they all are forward and backward compatible). But the thing is that a lot of other factors are also to be considered :
- If your power supply is powerful enough to drive it
- If your processor is again powerful enough without getting into any bottlenecking
- And seeing if your motherboard supports PCIe 1.0 or 2.0 (this usually is important upon seeing what GPU you install. Some need that higher bandwidth, whereas most low-end graphic card's don't).
All I need for you to tell me is that how much budget do you have and that you wanna spend on your Graphic Card. And secondly list your PC spec's so I can see what you got under the hood.
I dont happen to have a friend with a gpu to lend. but taking the lcd to gpu might be an option if i can find somebody nice enough . I'm holding on on buying the GPU for now untill im done investigating the lcd itself.GPU memory is not related to main memory. You can have a GPU that uses GDDR5 or whatever and it will work fine on a motherboard that supports only ddr2 for main memory. I hope you understand.
The built in GPU in the dg31pr isn't bad for 2D pictures and movies. ITs just limited to VGA output. Before you shell out for a new GPU I suggest borrowing a GPU from a friend and using that with the monitor just to see if DVI makes any difference.
edit: BTW one last point. IF you don't have the budget for a high end gpu you could always buy one of those 128MB RAM obsolete ones that are sold in the PG marketplace. Some people import them in lots and they are usually brand spanking new. Should be enough for 2D work and light gaming.
why you are paying american rates in Pakistan. Search cheaper region like Turkey. 13k for 13 months. Ms does not careShadowdragoo said:no idea how that is a steal by wasting 3500 rupees per month and for games that are removed before you can finish them off.xbox gamepass is garbage with no local prices
There are no such thing as "bad design" bro, its all "artistic vision" nowEternalBlizzard said:Is it just me or people lately seem to defend every bad game design decision made by the devs and try to give bullshit reasons for that? Or perhaps it's because I'm on reddit and discord