Any Math Genius Here? Solve this Question !
- Thread starter KDKHAN
- Start date
Ek rupai tax mai chala gaya 
On a serious note, lets look at it from a different perspective:
The customers paid 25+25+25 = 75 rupees. The manager returned 5 to the waiter of which he kept 2 for himself and gave 3 rupees back.
To split it up it would look like this 75 = 70 + 2 (amount the waiter took) + 3 (returned to the customers)
What amount did the customers pay? The answer is 70 + 2 (amount the waiter took) = 72 and 72/3 = 24 rupees per head
72 was the amount they paid and 3 rupeed were given back to them so: 72 + 3 = 75.
Lets look at it from yet another perspective:
75 rupees were paid to the waiter, each person paid 25. So 25+25+25=75
The manager returned 5 rupees to the waiter so technically it becomes 70+5. 70 of which would be paid by the customers so 70/3 = 23.33
But the waiter takes 2 rupees for himself, so 2/3 = 0.66 per head (don't get it?)
so 23.33 + 0.66 = 23.99 or 24 is the amount paid per head 24x3 = 72 is the total amount paid and 3 rupees were returned to them so 72 + 3 = 75 or (24+1) + (24+1) + (24+1) = 75
Still don't get it? Don't sweat it then :tv:
On a serious note, lets look at it from a different perspective:
The customers paid 25+25+25 = 75 rupees. The manager returned 5 to the waiter of which he kept 2 for himself and gave 3 rupees back.
To split it up it would look like this 75 = 70 + 2 (amount the waiter took) + 3 (returned to the customers)
What amount did the customers pay? The answer is 70 + 2 (amount the waiter took) = 72 and 72/3 = 24 rupees per head
72 was the amount they paid and 3 rupeed were given back to them so: 72 + 3 = 75.
Lets look at it from yet another perspective:
75 rupees were paid to the waiter, each person paid 25. So 25+25+25=75
The manager returned 5 rupees to the waiter so technically it becomes 70+5. 70 of which would be paid by the customers so 70/3 = 23.33
But the waiter takes 2 rupees for himself, so 2/3 = 0.66 per head (don't get it?)
so 23.33 + 0.66 = 23.99 or 24 is the amount paid per head 24x3 = 72 is the total amount paid and 3 rupees were returned to them so 72 + 3 = 75 or (24+1) + (24+1) + (24+1) = 75
Still don't get it? Don't sweat it then :tv:
Last edited:
Nope, the last part of the question in it self is wrong.
Take a look at my explanation
The question itself is flawed.
The bill was 75 rs. They paid 75 rs.
Why the hell is the rest of the transaction involving 5 rs?
The bill was 75 rs. They paid 75 rs.
Why the hell is the rest of the transaction involving 5 rs?
Bill was 75 (5 returned by the manager it becomes 70) out of the remaining 5 waiter took 2 ( 5 - 2 =3) now, 70 + 3 = 73!
Hence 73 is the actual logical amount in question!
73 / 3 = 24.33 per person!
You gave Rs.25 to a shopkeeper for buying a pack of cigarette
The shopkeeper in response gives you the pack and returns the balance of Re.1
What was your cost or expense actually ?
financing management ki koi jarr marrr di he :fp2:
this question is made in two perspectives , spending by one n saving by 2nd ,like that jaali note wala question ,
you cant recount , wiasay b paisy leny k bad wapis konsa dukandar karta he? bill was 75 not less , so why they would return?
2nd 75 was paid first not 24x3 , kahien b ni giya 1 rupia ,
this question is made in two perspectives , spending by one n saving by 2nd ,like that jaali note wala question ,
you cant recount , wiasay b paisy leny k bad wapis konsa dukandar karta he? bill was 75 not less , so why they would return?
2nd 75 was paid first not 24x3 , kahien b ni giya 1 rupia ,
You yourself gave the answer. They paid 25 and took 1 each making it 24.... so why the fuck are you adding the 2Rs taken by the waiter and expecting it to be 25.
Making it more clearer....
25 + 25 + 25 = 75
24 + 24 + 24 + 1 + 1 + 1 = 75
24 + 24 + 24 = 75 - 1 -1 -1 = 72 ---------- Note 72 is the amount they actually paid + the waiter's tip so there's no reason to add the waiter's tip in 72 again.. you get me? 72 already contains the waiter tip. You need to add the 3Rs returned to the customers. If you want to add 2 you have to make it (70 + 2 + 1 + 1 +1)
72+2 is there to confuse you
O Bhai !!!! Yaar they paid Rs.25 each and took back Re.1 each so they actually paid Rs.24 each making total 72
Than Rs. 2 was the tip availed (at his own) by the waiter, so it makes total 72+2 = 74.
Please find out where has gone the Rupee No.75 ?
On that note, 70 + 2 (waiter chacha ki tip) = 72!
Now, total amount was 75, 75 - 3 (returned rupees) = 72!!! NOT 74.
72 / 3 = 24 per person!
Hence Proved.
He made it more perplexed, did not resolve.
Let me reproduce the question here so that you guys may need not to go back on the first page :
#BanKDKHAN :crazy:He made it more perplexed, did not resolve.
Let me reproduce the question here so that you guys may need not to go back on the first page :
Spoiler: show
No offense but i think you just want to keep this thread going on... like it has happened in the past :shifty:
ahoo aja blizzard hum apni theory of automata continue karty hien ,
in peasants ko apas me larny de
We have disabled traderscore and are working on a fix. There was a bug with the plugin | Click for Discord
- No one is chatting at the moment.
-
Necrokiller:
The only valid thing from his pov he said in the video is AC dead since Black Flag. According to woke police that game was woke too. Welsh man in West Indies. So atleast he's consistent I guess lol -
Necrokiller:
It's based on an actual real life person so I don't think the woke police have a valid case here.
-
XPremiuM:
Meanwhile Ghost of Tsushima PC version is out now. Looks 100 times better than ASS Creed already. -
XPremiuM:
Did y'all see the new Assassin's Creed trailer? They finally made a AC set in Japan & then they put a negro as the male protagonist. Ubisoft is taking cues from Disney, and it isn't gonna end well for them, just like Disney. Go woke, go broke!
-
Necrokiller:
Phil should be held responsible for this shitfest too, just like Sarah, but it's highly likely that these decisions are coming from Satya. And this isn't even the end of it. More closures are coming.
-
SolitarySoldier:
if we are moving towards more and more popular trash across platforms that make billions for companies, I'm happy with all the barriers and exclusivity because at least that brings some pressure to create good stuff. -
SolitarySoldier:
Phil keeps talking about breaking barriers to gaming, making it accessible on all platforms yada yada, while killing competition and creativity at the same time. the fact that i actually believed him for a second lol
-
SolitarySoldier:
"These changes are not a reflection of the creativity and skill of the talented individuals at these teams or the risks they took to try new things" ... seems to me that's exactly what it is
-
XPremiuM:
Microsoft deserves all the hate they can get. Seriously i can't explain how much i want to curse them out.
-
XPremiuM:
They could've sold the studios instead of closing them, but the nazi bastards just didn't want competition down the road.
