Unboxing of my Ichill GTX260 and Asus 500 watt psu

Status
Not open for further replies.

LeGenD123

The One and Only
Sep 5, 2007
3,752
22
44
Lahore
Hey LeGenD123 I see you are running Q6600 at stock speed as well. What are your 3D mark 06 scores? Or do you use Vantage now?I think I am going to download vantage too. See how my scores turn out then.
I primarily use 3DMark03 and 3DMark Vantage for performance validation.

3DMark06 is heavily CPU bound. At 100% stock configuration and settings, I got 13300 points. But once the CPU is overclocked, much higher scores can be achieved. But I am not OC'ing my system in these days.

However my new GPU tore through 3DMark Vantage even at stock levels. Never before I have seen all tests in this benchmark run so smooth. My old GPU was no match against my current monster of a GPU in this program and neither in 3DMark 03.
 
Last edited:

Nomad

Senior
Feb 11, 2008
6,493
18
43
Lahore
I know this question was not pointed at me but I would like to say that you are mistaken. There is no such sticker on the box that says either 192sp or 216sp, in fact there is hardly anything mentioned on the box at all. There is just one random number written on the sticker which I am guessing is serial no.
I think what Ahsan meant is that normally Core 216 is clearly mentioned on the box. When it was launched GTX260 had 192sp units so it was not mentioned on the box as all the cards had the same units.

But when Core 216 version was launched it became necessary to mention this information on the box for clear identification. It's like when 9800GTX+ was launched. All previous cards were simple 9800GTX, and they continued to be called 9800GTX. It was not required to mention that this is not a + version, as the + version clearly mentioned it.

So if the card is a core 216 version, chances are that this information is mentioned somewhere on the box. Any box which does not have any such information has a big chance of being the 192sp version.
 

NinjaWithin

Beginner
May 22, 2009
30
0
11
Sialkot
I primarily use 3DMark03 and 3DMark Vantage for performance validation.

3DMark06 is heavily CPU bound. At 100% stock configuration and settings, I got 13300 points. But once the CPU is overclocked, much higher scores can be achieved. But I am not OC'ing my system in these days.

However my new GPU tore through 3DMark Vantage even at stock levels. Never before I have seen all tests in this benchmark run so smooth. My old
GPU was no match against my current monster of a GPU in this program and neither in 3DMark 03.
Heck even 13.3 K ain't half bad. My score is truly the lowest you can achieve with q6600 + 260 GTX combo. Its kind of freaking me out.

I think what Ahsan meant is that normally Core 216 is clearly mentioned on the box. When it was launched GTX260 had 192sp units so it was not mentioned on the box as all the cards had the same units.

But when Core 216 version was launched it became necessary to mention this information on the box for clear identification. It's like when 9800GTX+ was launched. All previous cards were simple 9800GTX, and they continued to be called 9800GTX. It was not required to mention that this is not a + version, as the + version clearly mentioned it.

So if the card is a core 216 version, chances are that this information is mentioned somewhere on the box. Any box which does not have any such information has a big chance of being the 192sp version.
Okay I get it now. Yes I was a bit curious when I didn't see 216 or MAXCORE or whatever written on the box thats why I asked the guy whether it was 216 sp and he said yes it is. I knew my instincts was telling me different that there is no way in hell a 216 sp card with an I-chill cooler can be this cheap in Pakistan but I was too excited at that time to listen to my own instincts. Lesson learned I suppose.
 

thugangel123

Versus Terminus
Jul 31, 2008
2,953
0
41
Planet Piss
Just my 50 cents but palit's 4850 would have been a great buy if I were you. I mean you just overclock the coreclock and you pratically got a 4870. The palit cooler is also pretty good not better then the inno3d one ofcourse but does it job with temps staying below 60C on load and it even has gpu throttling.

Also at which resolution are you gaming ? More resolution also helps in solving the bottleneck issue, 1680 res should be ideal.
 

NinjaWithin

Beginner
May 22, 2009
30
0
11
Sialkot
Also at which resolution are you gaming ? More resolution also helps in solving the bottleneck issue, 1680 res should be ideal.
Yes I realized that too. I get slightly better framerate when I am playing at 1400X1050 but only in some games.
 

fajoo24

CyboRg
Feb 21, 2008
4,093
3
43
Karachi
Just my 50 cents but palit's 4850 would have been a great buy if I were you. I mean you just overclock the coreclock and you pratically got a 4870. The palit cooler is also pretty good not better then the inno3d one ofcourse but does it job with temps staying below 60C on load and it even has gpu throttling.

Also at which resolution are you gaming ? More resolution also helps in solving the bottleneck issue, 1680 res should be ideal.
yar palit gpu is not available and it is not gonna come back......
 

mave3

Modding Freak!
Jan 30, 2009
5,182
2
44
Lahore
guys if u guys are satisfied with ur buy then thats gr8.
now there is not point in talking now.
u had ur chances @fajoo..
trust me u can ask any user on the forums....
what a 4870 can do as compared to ur normal card..
its no where near the performance of the 4870...
i dont believe in 3dmark scores anyways...
its just for fun sake.....if u wanna test ur gpu then run crysis bench marks and show us what juice this card has...!!!
 

opethian

PG Supervisor
Supervisor
Jun 26, 2008
9,564
0
42
Lahore
www.instagram.com
i think sir he has already posted his crysis benchez in ist post n they r very respectful considering he has a dualcore 2180@3ghz ...
but i think even then ichill 260gtx 192sp stock is slightly better than stock 4870 that ur having ... why cause of two things .. free physx n better OCing potential
 

Dark Sith

Expert
Jan 7, 2009
15,955
35
53
Elysium
guys if u guys are satisfied with ur buy then thats gr8.
now there is not point in talking now.
u had ur chances @fajoo..
trust me u can ask any user on the forums....
what a 4870 can do as compared to ur normal card..
its no where near the performance of the 4870...
i dont believe in 3dmark scores anyways...
its just for fun sake.....if u wanna test ur gpu then run crysis bench marks and show us what juice this card has...!!!

GUYS , the dude made a mistake lets not RUB IT IN TO HIM , what ever he got he spent good money on it , he must be dissapointed but nothing can be done about it now . so let him enjoy his card as it is .

even if its a weak card fajoo play with it for some time , and at a later stage sell it of ASAP u might loose some money but if u can manage to get a 4870 even in used go for it , the performance is stellar.

i know the feeling of geting something and not geting good performance from it .

but still hang in there .
 

Dark Sith

Expert
Jan 7, 2009
15,955
35
53
Elysium
yar palit gpu is not available and it is not gonna come back......

i think another reason for u geting low scores us ur CPU , if u can exchange or sell it with a friend and atleast get a c2d e6400 or quad core q6600 ur scores will improve dramatically.

i am excpecting a min of 3000-4000 points if u shift to a quad core. 15000 3d mark 06 u can get with this card easily with a quad core.

but in the end be happy with ur card ..dont listen to any one saying other wise..

(1)
 

fajoo24

CyboRg
Feb 21, 2008
4,093
3
43
Karachi
guys if u guys are satisfied with ur buy then thats gr8.
now there is not point in talking now.
u had ur chances @fajoo..
trust me u can ask any user on the forums....
what a 4870 can do as compared to ur normal card..
its no where near the performance of the 4870...
i dont believe in 3dmark scores anyways...
its just for fun sake.....if u wanna test ur gpu then run crysis bench marks and show us what juice this card has...!!!
bro already posted crysis benchies in the first post....did u see the review of 4870 by ali tayab on WCCFTECH?? he had 4870, he later shifted to GTX260 core 216 why?? i ain't gonna get involved in arguement but the web is full of reviews of gtx 260 192/216 sp vs 4870 512mb/1gb, see 3-4 reviews and decide for urself if ur statement it true or not.......i am getting impression of fanboyism here :looking:

GUYS , the dude made a mistake lets not RUB IT IN TO HIM , what ever he got he spent good money on it , he must be dissapointed but nothing can be done about it now . so let him enjoy his card as it is .

even if its a weak card fajoo play with it for some time , and at a later stage sell it of ASAP u might loose some money but if u can manage to get a 4870 even in used go for it , the performance is stellar.

i know the feeling of geting something and not geting good performance from it .

but still hang in there .
yar u should read the thread from the start, each page and then tell me how you got the impression that i am not satisified with my gpu......i am still wondering how u r making wrong conclusions on my behalf :|

and you too plz read 5-6 reviews and then comment.....
 

syedshahzad786

KING OF PGikistan!
Jun 12, 2007
1,958
0
41
Karachi
i really dont rely on scores....when a card can play all games at max then who cares of the scores....

my palit 4850 runs all games great so this beast can really make a bomb......and offcourse i never seen such a cooler..wao ..yaar fajoo do OC ur card ur card deserve a OC
 

Sire Ahsan

Knighted by the Queen of L33T
Jan 30, 2008
5,735
1
44
Karachi, Pakistan
I know this question was not pointed at me but I would like to say that you are mistaken. There is no such sticker on the box that says either 192sp or 216sp, in fact there is hardly anything mentioned on the box at all. There is just one random number written on the sticker which I am guessing is serial no.
The box itself will clearly say Core 216, its a mantadory thing to distinguish the normal and the C216s.

Otherwise the 'model code' im talking about goes something like this "H467QS512P" ... for HIS Radeon 4670 Ice-Q 512MB. A turbo model usually has T in the end if im not mistaken.

Though I havent seen myself, im sure a GTX260 would have a code clearly stating 216.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
General chit-chat
Help Users
We have disabled traderscore and are working on a fix. There was a bug with the plugin | Click for Discord
  • No one is chatting at the moment.
  • XPremiuM XPremiuM:
    BTW, i started Ghost of Tsushima, and it got me hooked within the first couple of minutes. I already know It's gonna be a memorable experience. This is how you make a proper Samurai game. Not that SJW game Ubisoft is making.
    Link
  • XPremiuM XPremiuM:
    Necrokiller said:
    Hellblade 2 has a lower peak player count than Redfall 😬
    That's still higher than it's total play length. A 5 hour campaign for a $50 game is downright scammy.
    Link
  • Necrokiller Necrokiller:
    Hellblade 2 has a lower peak player count than Redfall 😬
    Link
  • Necrokiller Necrokiller:
    LegacyGamerGuy said:
    Consoles were my main platform ever since Atari 2500. But now I think it's not worth it as PC especially with DLSS deliver far smoother performance. AW2 on console didn't even had ray tracing and ran below 30fps. Similar issues plagues DD2 on consoled.
    The cross gen era really made people think 60fps would be a new standard lol
    Link
  • Necrokiller Necrokiller:
    Welp, done with Hellblade 2. Thoroughly disappointed. Such a nothing burger after the unique experience of the first game.
    Link
  • L LegacyGamerGuy:
    I have a PS5 but I am not satisfied with the experience. I am currently saving for a 4080 64 GB rig soon. Bit will wait for Pro if performance improves. This gen has been so bad I don't plan on buying consoles anymore for AAA gaming.
    Link
  • L LegacyGamerGuy:
    Consoles were my main platform ever since Atari 2500. But now I think it's not worth it as PC especially with DLSS deliver far smoother performance. AW2 on console didn't even had ray tracing and ran below 30fps. Similar issues plagues DD2 on consoled.
    Link
  • GloriousChicken GloriousChicken:
    It is indeed the worst generation by far.
    Link
  • L LegacyGamerGuy:
    Both PS and Xbox have been a flop this gen as they can barely maintain 30 fps in a lot of AAA games th.
    Link
  • L LegacyGamerGuy:
    As per WCCF Tech review, Xbox Series X doesn't even maintain a consistent FPS and sometimes drops into the mid-20fps range. That's unacceptable, tbh.
    Link
  • L LegacyGamerGuy:
    The Xbox Series X can drop into the mid-20fps range,
    Link
  • L LegacyGamerGuy:
    Still, I wonder why the PC Gamer rated it worse than Gollum. 🤔
    Link
  • NaNoW NaNoW:
    its more on me, than gamepass tbh
    Link
  • NaNoW NaNoW:
    I am not spending as much time with it these days
    Link
  • NaNoW NaNoW:
    I feel like with gamepass
    Link
  • Chandoo Chandoo:
    LegacyGamerGuy said:
    Gradually transitioning from console gaming to PC as the games are not worth it. 6 hours of Hellblade 2 is just not worth the $50 price tag.
    Score 1 for game pass. I wouldn't pay full price for this at retail either.
    Link
  • L LegacyGamerGuy:
    Gradually transitioning from console gaming to PC as the games are not worth it. 6 hours of Hellblade 2 is just not worth the $50 price tag.
    Link
  • L LegacyGamerGuy:
    Just downloaded my first legit digital PC game on GoG at a discount of $8: Two Point Hospital. The same team behind Theme Hospital Two Point Studios now part of Sega. And I am having more fun than most recent AAA games except of course BG3.
    Link
  • Chandoo Chandoo:
    gottdamnnn HB2 looks amazing. UE5 finally living up to its potential.
    Link
  • L LegacyGamerGuy:
    Still, I don't like either Sony or Microsoft as they are focusing more on corporate greed than delighting customers. PC gaming is best of gaming and worth every penny.
    Link
  • L LegacyGamerGuy:
    PC Gamer score of 58/100 for Hellblade 2??? Is it really worse than Gollum that was 64/100? Microsoft games can't even come close to high scores of Sony exclusives apparently.
    Link
  • Necrokiller Necrokiller:
    Chandoo said:
    Hellblade 2 83 OpenCritic, not bad at all. 2 points higher than the first game.
    first one is 84 Opencritic. Saga dropped to 82.
    Link
  • Necrokiller Necrokiller:
    Saeen abhi tak to first one was better in every way. Atleast the first hour-ish
    Link
  • Chandoo Chandoo:
    Hellblade 2 83 OpenCritic, not bad at all. 2 points higher than the first game.
    Link
  • L LegacyGamerGuy:
    About the Microsoft (and Sony) debate, I feel both have become too greedy and losing their minds over corporate greed. Personally, I will never buy any console next gen and switch to PC gaming where democracy reins.
    Link
    XPremiuM XPremiuM: BTW, i started Ghost of Tsushima, and it got me hooked within the first couple of minutes. I...