:lol:
Obviously its Typo but LuLz nonetheless
And AFQ has made an error as per [MENTION=25983]AbbY[/MENTION] aswell
something about using overclocked 2600K's results as Stock
As per AbbY whaa?
---------- Post added at 10:20 AM ---------- Previous post was at 09:25 AM ----------
Frankly speaking I am not impressed with IVY Bridge at all. I think You are better off with Sandy esp interms of overclocking. Overall Ivy might be better but not by much on stock speeds 3770K is slightly just slightly better than 2600K which is not impressive.
I've said this earlier and I'm saying this again.
Ivy Bridge is NOT a new microarchitecture like Sandy Bridge, Nehalem/Lynnfield and the Core 2 series. It's, as they describe it, the 'tick' to the 'tock'. It's a die shrink to the same architecture of the Sandy Bridge. It was not supposed to perform miles ahead of the Sandy Bridge. The Haswell series is intended to do that!
The Ivy Bridge was a mere shrunken die to the Sandy bridge, with a change of transistors, bringing in 3d tri gate transistors, albeit staying more or less the same.
The Ivy Bridge processors use considerably a lower amount of power, thus they are very well suited for notebooks and portable computing.
"Overall Ivy may be better but not by much"
Well, it's better by what was expected of it. It isn't supposed to be a 50% gain over its predecessor anyway. It's doing what it was meant to do. It is not fail at all, like [MENTION=13435]zainu[/MENTION] mentioned up there. It was brought in to primarily lower up the usage of power needed by the processor, it's doing that effectively. Just because YOU feel it's fail doesn't mean it's fail for the rest of the world. It's not doing what YOU expected it to do. But it's very much doing what was expected of it!
---------- Post added at 10:36 AM ---------- Previous post was at 10:26 AM ----------
- Bad temps as compare to 2nd gen. 32nm CPUs
Comparing temps on a 32nm processor to a processor on 22nm with more or less the same cooler is bullshit. People need to stop doing that and look at the advantages it poses.
People moving on from 65nm->45nm faced lower temperatures because of a simple phenomena. It's basic thermal physics. Since the die was reduced by 20nm in that tick, the heat produced : heat dissipated ratio favored the cooler side, because there was
much less heat produced, and
slightly more time to dissipate it, resulting in an aggregate cooler chip over the long run.
In the case of Sandy Bridge -> Ivy Bridge, the die shrunk by 10nm. Since the die was already very small, at a mere 32nm, the heat dissipation was already way to slow. It's just that 32nm produced just the right amount of heat produced : heat dissipated ratio.
With Intel bringing it down to 22nm, the die is producing a
slightly lower amount of heat, though taking
much longer to dissipate. Notice how it's the opposite of the 65->45nm switch? I won't be surprised if Skylake/Skymont or whatever the 12/14nm ones sare called produce more heat. Actually, in theory, they'll run way too hot when overclocked. Intel must devise another way, or get rid of integrated graphics on that series to give it some room to run cooler.
---------- Post added at 10:39 AM ---------- Previous post was at 10:36 AM ----------
When it comes to technology, one shouldnt wait and just get whats available.
DIS FUCKING AGREE!
I waiting MONTHS for unlocked Sandy and P67 chipset to be readily available in Pakistan, before getting a locked processor and an H67 chipset. A week later, the unlocked processors were brought in after 8 days. :'(
---------- Post added at 10:46 AM ---------- Previous post was at 10:39 AM ----------
@AFQ: M looking to upgrade from i3 2100 to an i5 (and will probably not overclock in the future). Which i5 would be the best for me in terms of price to performance ratio?
Mera lay lena (2500) I'll get an unlocked used processor from someone or on ebay or sth this summer
If only Prices of 2600K comes down within range it will be better investment
Overclocks like crazy and is a bit more future proof with 8 Threads
And... what exactly do you aim to do with 8 threads? People with 2500k's are the best of in terms of relative performance per amount spent at the moment and I see no point of them upgrading.
---------- Post added at 10:58 AM ---------- Previous post was at 10:46 AM ----------
Ohhh... So whats the difference between engineering sample and proper chip?
Great AFQ received a chip
ES FREE hain aur Retail paison ki. And lol "proper chip?" :lol: woh bhi proper hoti hai bhai, in fact woh log hi uss ko "proper" recieve kartay hain. :lol:
Not only that
The ES chips are indeed sent for free to prospective reviewers and testers. (Though they sent an Engineering Sample to one of our Doctors. Oh the irony.
)
The ES chips come without manuals, without heatsink+fan, have all the bugs that need to be ironed out and removed in the OEM chip. Furthermore, the ES chips have fully unlocked multipliers, like in the K processors, or atleast that's how it was with the Q series. All in all, the final OEM chip may have a feature or two that the ES one doesn't, but it's more or less the same. That said, ES chips are illegal to sell, and anyone selling that can be taken to court by Intel.