just like other pg members ( khayali pilao ) m making a pc with amd bulldozer 8150 , 30 gb ram and bla bla ,, its 15 years from from now 
AMD bulldozer project extreme
- Thread starter marzbarz0007
- Start date
Guys its just intel who is stopping amd processors in pak, just think that new bulldozer 8150 costs 18k if this processor comes in pakistan who will buy intel extreme all sandy bridge technology ....amd processors are reliable in anyway and benchmarks about bulldozer is all fake just INTEL dont wanna allow that processor ... How many processors intel launched in last 12 months 1st generation series i can bet hardly few people bought 1ST generation processors in 6 months they launched sandy bridge technology...why they didnt release the sandy bridge technology in 1st generation just to grab money.... now ivy bridge is coming in feb 2012 ...... Intel is afraid of new bulldozer series which is coming in december that will be revolution in processors also if u know overclocking record made by bulldozer 8150 and u people are saying bulldozer is crap Ask urself
Last edited:
After reading it wont say anything.just like other pg members ( khayali pilao ) m making a pc with amd bulldozer 8150 , 30 gb ram and bla bla ,, its 15 years from from now
View attachment 59755
its a world record overclock link watch it
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pm2DtdPW1I4&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pm2DtdPW1I4&feature=related
If you honestly believe in investing money in a processor that does not perform as much as it boasts, and overclocks up to what, 8.5ghz ?, you should invest in that. Tell me one thing, who the bloody hell will arrange the Liquid Helium and maintain the system? Is just breaking a world record enough to be of practical, feasible use? Btw, just so you know, 8.5ghz is achieved after disabling 6 of the 8 cores. So, point in doing that?
Another thing, firstly you're comparing an octa-core processor to quad cored and dual cored intel processors in terms of revenue. That's plain stupid.
You're saying the benchmarks are biased? Well let me tell you this, Intel does not create the benching utilities to show unfair advantage over AMD in terms of results. You're telling me, all of the benchmark utilities out there are biased towards Intel?
Wow.
And just so you know, I've been a life long fan of AMD and have no affiliation with Intel in any way whatsoever. I've had equal experience with AMDs as with Intel. Heck, I still have an AMD by-PC.
No doubt AMD bulldozer will be a huge success as all the benchmarks are fake. Why? because they are released before the launch of processor. The Processor is launched on October 12, 2011 where as the benchmarks reported are mostly before October 12. You can go to the site http://www.cpubenchmark.net/ to see the real performance bench marks of AMD Fx-8150. AMD FX-8150 is at No.22 with performance benchmark of 8,511 where as i7 2500k is at no 36 with performance bench marks of 7,450 as on November 19, 2011. Another factor please remember Microsoft applications supports Intel only, if u want to really try AMD try on Linux.
---------- Post added at 11:58 PM ---------- Previous post was at 11:31 PM ----------
No doubt AMD bulldozer will be a huge success as all the benchmarks are fake. Why? because they are released before the launch of processor. The Processor was launched on October 12, 2011 where as the benchmarks reported are mostly before October 12. You can go to the site http://www.cpubenchmark.net/ to see the real performance bench marks of AMD Fx-8150. AMD FX-8150 is at No.22 with performance benchmark of 8,511 where as i7 2500k is at no 36 with performance bench marks of 7,450 as on November 19, 2011. Another factor please remember Microsoft windows supports Intel to a greater extend. Intel processors are specifically designed for Ms Windows that's why the benchmarks are greater than AMD. if u want to really try AMD try on Linux
---------- Post added at 11:58 PM ---------- Previous post was at 11:31 PM ----------
No doubt AMD bulldozer will be a huge success as all the benchmarks are fake. Why? because they are released before the launch of processor. The Processor was launched on October 12, 2011 where as the benchmarks reported are mostly before October 12. You can go to the site http://www.cpubenchmark.net/ to see the real performance bench marks of AMD Fx-8150. AMD FX-8150 is at No.22 with performance benchmark of 8,511 where as i7 2500k is at no 36 with performance bench marks of 7,450 as on November 19, 2011. Another factor please remember Microsoft windows supports Intel to a greater extend. Intel processors are specifically designed for Ms Windows that's why the benchmarks are greater than AMD. if u want to really try AMD try on Linux
Last edited:
We have disabled traderscore and are working on a fix. There was a bug with the plugin | Click for Discord
- No one is chatting at the moment.
-
XPremiuM:
BTW, i started Ghost of Tsushima, and it got me hooked within the first couple of minutes. I already know It's gonna be a memorable experience. This is how you make a proper Samurai game. Not that SJW game Ubisoft is making. -
XPremiuM:
That's still higher than it's total play length. A 5 hour campaign for a $50 game is downright scammy.Necrokiller said:Hellblade 2 has a lower peak player count than Redfall
-
Necrokiller:
The cross gen era really made people think 60fps would be a new standard lolLegacyGamerGuy said: -
Necrokiller:
Welp, done with Hellblade 2. Thoroughly disappointed. Such a nothing burger after the unique experience of the first game.
-
L LegacyGamerGuy:I have a PS5 but I am not satisfied with the experience. I am currently saving for a 4080 64 GB rig soon. Bit will wait for Pro if performance improves. This gen has been so bad I don't plan on buying consoles anymore for AAA gaming.
-
L LegacyGamerGuy:Consoles were my main platform ever since Atari 2500. But now I think it's not worth it as PC especially with DLSS deliver far smoother performance. AW2 on console didn't even had ray tracing and ran below 30fps. Similar issues plagues DD2 on consoled.
-
L LegacyGamerGuy:Both PS and Xbox have been a flop this gen as they can barely maintain 30 fps in a lot of AAA games th.
-
L LegacyGamerGuy:As per WCCF Tech review, Xbox Series X doesn't even maintain a consistent FPS and sometimes drops into the mid-20fps range. That's unacceptable, tbh.
-
Chandoo:
Score 1 for game pass. I wouldn't pay full price for this at retail either.LegacyGamerGuy said: -
L LegacyGamerGuy:Gradually transitioning from console gaming to PC as the games are not worth it. 6 hours of Hellblade 2 is just not worth the $50 price tag.
-
L LegacyGamerGuy:Just downloaded my first legit digital PC game on GoG at a discount of $8: Two Point Hospital. The same team behind Theme Hospital Two Point Studios now part of Sega. And I am having more fun than most recent AAA games except of course BG3.
-
L LegacyGamerGuy:Still, I don't like either Sony or Microsoft as they are focusing more on corporate greed than delighting customers. PC gaming is best of gaming and worth every penny.
-
L LegacyGamerGuy:PC Gamer score of 58/100 for Hellblade 2??? Is it really worse than Gollum that was 64/100? Microsoft games can't even come close to high scores of Sony exclusives apparently.
-
L LegacyGamerGuy:About the Microsoft (and Sony) debate, I feel both have become too greedy and losing their minds over corporate greed. Personally, I will never buy any console next gen and switch to PC gaming where democracy reins.
XPremiuM:
BTW, i started Ghost of Tsushima, and it got me hooked within the first couple of minutes. I...