AMD bulldozer project extreme

zainu

Seasoned
Jul 2, 2009
2,848
1
41
Karachi
ur project is a failure.. even though its khayali plao.. but yaar khayal is fail.. bulldozer is a fail (lmao)
 

HITMAN YJK

Proficient
Oct 20, 2011
762
1
24
ISLAMABAD
Guys its just intel who is stopping amd processors in pak, just think that new bulldozer 8150 costs 18k if this processor comes in pakistan who will buy intel extreme all sandy bridge technology ....amd processors are reliable in anyway and benchmarks about bulldozer is all fake just INTEL dont wanna allow that processor ... How many processors intel launched in last 12 months 1st generation series i can bet hardly few people bought 1ST generation processors in 6 months they launched sandy bridge technology...why they didnt release the sandy bridge technology in 1st generation just to grab money.... now ivy bridge is coming in feb 2012 ...... Intel is afraid of new bulldozer series which is coming in december that will be revolution in processors also if u know overclocking record made by bulldozer 8150 and u people are saying bulldozer is crap Ask urself
 
Last edited:

AbbY

Administrator
ADMIN
Nov 20, 2008
6,421
85
54
Ankara
Guys its just intel who is stopping amd processors in pak, just think that new bulldozer 8150 costs 18k if this processor comes in pakistan who will buy intel extreme all sandy bridge technology ....amd processors are reliable in anyway and benchmarks about bulldozer is all fake just INTEL dont wanna allow that processor ... How many processors intel launched in last 12 months 1st generation series i can bet hardly few people bought 1ST generation processors in 6 months they launched sandy bridge technology...why they didnt release the sandy bridge technology in 1st generation just to grab money.... now ivy bridge is coming in feb 2012 ...... Intel is afraid of new bulldozer series which is coming in december that will be revolution in processors also if u know overclocking record made by bulldozer 8150 and u people are saying bulldozer is crap Ask urself
If you honestly believe in investing money in a processor that does not perform as much as it boasts, and overclocks up to what, 8.5ghz ?, you should invest in that. Tell me one thing, who the bloody hell will arrange the Liquid Helium and maintain the system? Is just breaking a world record enough to be of practical, feasible use? Btw, just so you know, 8.5ghz is achieved after disabling 6 of the 8 cores. So, point in doing that?

Another thing, firstly you're comparing an octa-core processor to quad cored and dual cored intel processors in terms of revenue. That's plain stupid.

You're saying the benchmarks are biased? Well let me tell you this, Intel does not create the benching utilities to show unfair advantage over AMD in terms of results. You're telling me, all of the benchmark utilities out there are biased towards Intel?

Wow.

And just so you know, I've been a life long fan of AMD and have no affiliation with Intel in any way whatsoever. I've had equal experience with AMDs as with Intel. Heck, I still have an AMD by-PC.
 

aafiatt

New member
Jul 20, 2011
6
0
1
No doubt AMD bulldozer will be a huge success as all the benchmarks are fake. Why? because they are released before the launch of processor. The Processor is launched on October 12, 2011 where as the benchmarks reported are mostly before October 12. You can go to the site http://www.cpubenchmark.net/ to see the real performance bench marks of AMD Fx-8150. AMD FX-8150 is at No.22 with performance benchmark of 8,511 where as i7 2500k is at no 36 with performance bench marks of 7,450 as on November 19, 2011. Another factor please remember Microsoft applications supports Intel only, if u want to really try AMD try on Linux.

---------- Post added at 11:58 PM ---------- Previous post was at 11:31 PM ----------

No doubt AMD bulldozer will be a huge success as all the benchmarks are fake. Why? because they are released before the launch of processor. The Processor was launched on October 12, 2011 where as the benchmarks reported are mostly before October 12. You can go to the site http://www.cpubenchmark.net/ to see the real performance bench marks of AMD Fx-8150. AMD FX-8150 is at No.22 with performance benchmark of 8,511 where as i7 2500k is at no 36 with performance bench marks of 7,450 as on November 19, 2011. Another factor please remember Microsoft windows supports Intel to a greater extend. Intel processors are specifically designed for Ms Windows that's why the benchmarks are greater than AMD. if u want to really try AMD try on Linux
 
Last edited:
General chit-chat
Help Users
We have disabled traderscore and are working on a fix. There was a bug with the plugin | Click for Discord
  • No one is chatting at the moment.
    faraany3k faraany3k: Tears of Kingdom saal pehle shuru ki thee, ab tk pehle area se nai nikla. Life sucks donkey balls.