And?
My point was that keeping that in mind when you see PC gamers Abuses will lead to baning about the game in various performance threads, it shouldn't come as a surprise, whether it's a lack of optimization or pushing effects beyond the reach of the currently available hardware to max everything out.
I mean you could Abuses will lead to ban about a game that isn't performing to your standards doesn't mean its justified like the guy faraany was talking about. He is whining that his Gtx 1060 cannot do 60fps at Ultra.
And like I said to franny, I wasn't even talking about that guy with my comment. The general PC performance thread is full of people saying the same thing.
Do the settings match or exceed consoles?
Conveniently snipping the part of my post where a console comparison was made doesn't make my logic any less sound
Conveniently not answering my questionConveniently snipping the part of my post where a console comparison was made doesn't make my logic any less sound
A game not being able to max out it's in-game settings (not even counting any external mods) on the strongest / most expensive hardware available commercially right now should be unacceptable by any standards. This is Crysisgate all over again.
That 1050 Ti comment is a direct answer to your question.Conveniently not answering my question
Console comparison can only be made when you know what are the console equivalents. They sure as heck aint Ultra lol
This was my question:
Because you succeeded at pointing that 23-28fps is "worse performance than the consoles", but you failed to tell us the settings of those "beautiful 4K images".
I don't think anyone claimed that the game isn't buggy at launch.
That post doesn't even back up the claim with anything. Here you can see 1050Ti running the game at above 30fps on 1080p Medium.
That's not relevant to the game's optimization, this is what you can't understand. Plenty of games considered "well optimized" struggle to maintain 60fps on their absolute highest settings at 4K. Throw in MSAA (which Red Dead 2 supports, and you don't know the settings so maybe that explains the performance) and games in general will even struggle to maintain 30fps. I think more than anything else that just proves that 4K is still a waste of resources, and thus investing in a 4K display is a waste of money.
And the video I posted does prove that 1050Ti can handle Medium easily, when you said it cannot even do Low based on a random Era post. I wouldn't have to play devils advocate if you showed some logic in your claims.
Struggle to maintain 60 FPS sure, but we're talking about 23~28 FPS here. 60 is a pipe dream at that resolution and those settings on the worlds most expensive / technologically advanced GPU right now.
Read the edit.
You just said you don't know the settings for those screenshots. Maybe they are with MSAA enabled? Why are you so quick to make these conclusions?
I accept yours tooI accept your apology.
I clearly said we don't know what settings they're using. However 23~28 FPS is not acceptable on a console game, let alone the most expensive GPU in the market.
There's no St Denis footage in that video Necro :laugh1:I accept yours too
Speaking of taking the L
Necrokiller:
Necrokiller:
XPremiuM:
XPremiuM:
Necrokiller:
SolitarySoldier:
SolitarySoldier:
SolitarySoldier:
XPremiuM:
XPremiuM:
XPremiuM:
