Bhae mere DF analysis aane do itna ghussa kyun hai bhai? :lol:
The era post you conveniently posted, why didn't you post the DF guy's response to it?
Here, let me do it.
If we're going to post posts, why not post the follow up from the original 1050 Ti user asking what areas DF have checked so far, to which there is no reply as of yet :laugh1:
https://www.resetera.com/threads/red-dead-redemption-ii-pc-performance-thread.151303/post-26183018
Let's recap the L's.
- At least 2 people playing the game, and one on live stream benching the game even, have said outright that a 1050 Ti cannot do 30 FPS/1080p in the St. Denis location. There might be a lot more sources for this if we take the time to go through the Reddit mega threads and whatnot.
- A Benchmark video featuring a snippet in St. Denis was posted with an avg of 32 FPS or so, but DF have confirmed the actual game is more performance intensive than the benchmark tool. The base PS4 version runs at an average of 29 FPS at 1080p with settings arguably higher than the Low on PC by eye balling 1050 Ti and PS4 videos.
- DF have not released their video yet, we do not know what areas their videos will cover. Most other benchmarks so far have only covered the lighter Prologue areas or the barren world, smaller emptier towns.
- The game is generally performing poorly across a glut of cards from 1050Ti to delivering a cinematic 23~28 FPS at 4K Ultra + 4XMSAA on the worlds most expensive GPU right now. There are numerous articles all across the internet about this, this is not something any one poster is making up.
And yet Necro you're still playing the devils advocate ... that too for a game that you have claimed many times you have no plans of playing :laugh1:
Matlab if this was the Metro Exodus topic it would make sense, but here it's just L's for the sake of L's :laugh1: