Nikon Nikkor Lens AF Zoom-Nikkor 70-300mm f/4-5.6G Lens

Pleasant

Expert
Jul 19, 2008
15,304
13
44
Dubai, UAE
I Found out this lens quite cheap
would like to know if does it have AUTOFOCUS / Focus motor with it
if not which one has it ?
[MENTION=5946]hotgamerft[/MENTION] [MENTION=4563]opethian[/MENTION]
 

hotgamerft

lolz
Sep 10, 2008
4,564
16
44
Peshawar
I Found out this lens quite cheap
would like to know if does it have AUTOFOCUS / Focus motor with it
if not which one has it ?
[MENTION=5946]hotgamerft[/MENTION] [MENTION=4563]opethian[/MENTION]
I have it and it doesn't autofocus on my D3100

The image quality isn't that great either, but what can you expect from a cheap lens
 

Pleasant

Expert
Jul 19, 2008
15,304
13
44
Dubai, UAE
I have it and it doesn't autofocus on my D3100

The image quality isn't that great either, but what can you expect from a cheap lens
so what should i go with ?
should i look for this one
Nikon 55-200mm f/4-5.6G ED IF AF-S DX VR Nikkor

or look into Sigma / Tamron
 

FaridAhmed

Closer To The Edge
Aug 31, 2009
2,741
0
41
Lahore
hmm let me tag him
@FaridAhmed
@Pleasant produces nice results, it also has built in focus motor too. renders nice bokeh, will also produce nice results in low light if one knows how to utilize potential

you might have seen my samples on flicker. Adding some here


my primary use is with d5300 body, it is without the AA filter so results are sharp straight from camera but i have also tried it on d5100 and its fine too
which body are you using?
 
Last edited:

Pleasant

Expert
Jul 19, 2008
15,304
13
44
Dubai, UAE
@Pleasant produces nice results, it also has built in focus motor too. renders nice bokeh, will also produce nice results in low light if one knows how to utilize potential

you might have seen my samples on flicker. Adding some here


- - - Updated - - -



@Pleasant produces nice results, it also has built in focus motor too. renders nice bokeh, will also produce nice results in low light if one knows how to utilize potential

you might have seen my samples on flicker. Adding some here
Thanks for the feedback yeah i have seen those on flickr for how much you bought ? and whats the current price for this lens
 

Pleasant

Expert
Jul 19, 2008
15,304
13
44
Dubai, UAE
i had no idea about its price :O

khair in price for 55-200 i dont think there is any other better telephoto option
Yeah seems like i am left with this one as 70-300mm isnt that good according to [MENTION=5946]hotgamerft[/MENTION] experience and i believe it will be hard to work without AUTOFOCUS on telephoto though i am using 50mm with manual focus and not having problem using that so i have no idea how 55-200mm or 70-300mm will go about in manual focus with handheld

- - - Updated - - -

i had no idea about its price :O

khair in price for 55-200 i dont think there is any other better telephoto option
Yeah seems like i am left with this one as 70-300mm isnt that good according to [MENTION=5946]hotgamerft[/MENTION] experience and i believe it will be hard to work without AUTOFOCUS on telephoto though i am using 50mm with manual focus and not having problem using that so i have no idea how 55-200mm or 70-300mm will go about in manual focus with handheld
 

dualaxe

Well-known member
Apr 5, 2009
1,100
0
41
Karachi
So what option do i have in cheaper category to go with telephoto
You can get the VR1 version of 55-200 for 12k max. VrII is slightly more expensive. It's made to work on DX cameras only but has fast AF and decent sharpness. Keep in mind that all G lenses do not have AF motor. G simple means gelded, that is, the aperture ring is absent and the aperture can be controlled electronically. Af-S lenses have servo motors, AF lenses don't. So a lens can be G and at the same time it may not have a motor in it. Sigma 70-300 is also decent enough and it comes with an AF motor. It's sharper than tamron's 70-300. But nikon focuses faster than sigma and tamron.
 

FaridAhmed

Closer To The Edge
Aug 31, 2009
2,741
0
41
Lahore
Yeah seems like i am left with this one as 70-300mm isnt that good according to [MENTION=5946]hotgamerft[/MENTION] experience and i believe it will be hard to work without AUTOFOCUS on telephoto though i am using 50mm with manual focus and not having problem using that so i have no idea how 55-200mm or 70-300mm will go about in manual focus with handheld

- - - Updated - - -



Yeah seems like i am left with this one as 70-300mm isnt that good according to [MENTION=5946]hotgamerft[/MENTION] experience and i believe it will be hard to work without AUTOFOCUS on telephoto though i am using 50mm with manual focus and not having problem using that so i have no idea how 55-200mm or 70-300mm will go about in manual focus with handheld
Shooting 50 you probably would have still objects. Shooting telephoto on 200-300 a little jerk will mean a lot of moment in view finder. Do keep that in mind
 

Pleasant

Expert
Jul 19, 2008
15,304
13
44
Dubai, UAE
You can get the VR1 version of 55-200 for 12k max. VrII is slightly more expensive. It's made to work on DX cameras only but has fast AF and decent sharpness. Keep in mind that all G lenses do not have AF motor. G simple means gelded, that is, the aperture ring is absent and the aperture can be controlled electronically. Af-S lenses have servo motors, AF lenses don't. So a lens can be G and at the same time it may not have a motor in it. Sigma 70-300 is also decent enough and it comes with an AF motor. It's sharper than tamron's 70-300. But nikon focuses faster than sigma and tamron.
Thanks for the details So AFS has the servo motor "S" Stands servo here

So which one should i be going with

Nikon 55-200mm f/4-5.6G ED IF AF-S DX VR Nikkor Zoom Lens price, review and buy in UAE, Dubai, Abu Dhabi | Souq.com
SIGMA 70-300mm F4-5.6 DG Macro Zoom Lens for NIKON price, review and buy in UAE, Dubai, Abu Dhabi | Souq.com

and then there is this
Nikon Sigma 70-300mm F4-5.6 APO DG Macro Lens, Black price, review and buy in UAE, Dubai, Abu Dhabi | Souq.com
 
Last edited:
General chit-chat
Help Users
We have disabled traderscore and are working on a fix. There was a bug with the plugin | Click for Discord
  • No one is chatting at the moment.
  • Necrokiller Necrokiller:
    LegacyGamerGuy said:
    Consoles were my main platform ever since Atari 2500. But now I think it's not worth it as PC especially with DLSS deliver far smoother performance. AW2 on console didn't even had ray tracing and ran below 30fps. Similar issues plagues DD2 on consoled.
    The cross gen era really made people think 60fps would be a new standard lol
    Link
  • Necrokiller Necrokiller:
    Welp, done with Hellblade 2. Thoroughly disappointed. Such a nothing burger after the unique experience of the first game.
    Link
  • L LegacyGamerGuy:
    I have a PS5 but I am not satisfied with the experience. I am currently saving for a 4080 64 GB rig soon. Bit will wait for Pro if performance improves. This gen has been so bad I don't plan on buying consoles anymore for AAA gaming.
    Link
  • L LegacyGamerGuy:
    Consoles were my main platform ever since Atari 2500. But now I think it's not worth it as PC especially with DLSS deliver far smoother performance. AW2 on console didn't even had ray tracing and ran below 30fps. Similar issues plagues DD2 on consoled.
    Link
  • GloriousChicken GloriousChicken:
    It is indeed the worst generation by far.
    Link
  • L LegacyGamerGuy:
    Both PS and Xbox have been a flop this gen as they can barely maintain 30 fps in a lot of AAA games th.
    Link
  • L LegacyGamerGuy:
    As per WCCF Tech review, Xbox Series X doesn't even maintain a consistent FPS and sometimes drops into the mid-20fps range. That's unacceptable, tbh.
    Link
  • L LegacyGamerGuy:
    The Xbox Series X can drop into the mid-20fps range,
    Link
  • L LegacyGamerGuy:
    Still, I wonder why the PC Gamer rated it worse than Gollum. 🤔
    Link
  • NaNoW NaNoW:
    its more on me, than gamepass tbh
    Link
  • NaNoW NaNoW:
    I am not spending as much time with it these days
    Link
  • NaNoW NaNoW:
    I feel like with gamepass
    Link
  • Chandoo Chandoo:
    LegacyGamerGuy said:
    Gradually transitioning from console gaming to PC as the games are not worth it. 6 hours of Hellblade 2 is just not worth the $50 price tag.
    Score 1 for game pass. I wouldn't pay full price for this at retail either.
    Link
  • L LegacyGamerGuy:
    Gradually transitioning from console gaming to PC as the games are not worth it. 6 hours of Hellblade 2 is just not worth the $50 price tag.
    Link
  • L LegacyGamerGuy:
    Just downloaded my first legit digital PC game on GoG at a discount of $8: Two Point Hospital. The same team behind Theme Hospital Two Point Studios now part of Sega. And I am having more fun than most recent AAA games except of course BG3.
    Link
  • Chandoo Chandoo:
    gottdamnnn HB2 looks amazing. UE5 finally living up to its potential.
    Link
  • L LegacyGamerGuy:
    Still, I don't like either Sony or Microsoft as they are focusing more on corporate greed than delighting customers. PC gaming is best of gaming and worth every penny.
    Link
  • L LegacyGamerGuy:
    PC Gamer score of 58/100 for Hellblade 2??? Is it really worse than Gollum that was 64/100? Microsoft games can't even come close to high scores of Sony exclusives apparently.
    Link
  • Necrokiller Necrokiller:
    Chandoo said:
    Hellblade 2 83 OpenCritic, not bad at all. 2 points higher than the first game.
    first one is 84 Opencritic. Saga dropped to 82.
    Link
  • Necrokiller Necrokiller:
    Saeen abhi tak to first one was better in every way. Atleast the first hour-ish
    Link
  • Chandoo Chandoo:
    Hellblade 2 83 OpenCritic, not bad at all. 2 points higher than the first game.
    Link
  • L LegacyGamerGuy:
    About the Microsoft (and Sony) debate, I feel both have become too greedy and losing their minds over corporate greed. Personally, I will never buy any console next gen and switch to PC gaming where democracy reins.
    Link
  • L LegacyGamerGuy:
    No news about Google Play Store hacking. What is the source?
    Link
  • Link
  • Aciel Aciel:
    This is the error.
    Link
    Necrokiller Necrokiller: Consoles were my main platform ever since Atari 2500. But now I think it's not worth it as PC...