The Batman Delayed to March 2022

manigamer

Respect Ma AuthoritA!!!
Global Mod
Jun 28, 2007
52,087
395
89
On earth...Lahore
[h=1]Ben Affleck Gives Final Word On The Batman Script?[/h]

His first foray into the world of comic book superheroes didn’t go as anyone had hoped, but when the news came that Ben Affleck would don the cape and cowl as Zack Snyder’s Batman, those who scoffed at the decision were living in the past. While the heartthrob actor had been tied to the troubling Daredevil, the man cast as DC’s darkest icon was taking the part as an Oscar-winning director and writer. And at the time, some sources went so far as to claim that a solo Batman film for Affleck to write, direct, and star in was part of the deal, as one of his demands.
In the months since Affleck’s performance in Batman V Superman was generally praised, Warner Bros. made another fan dream come true: not only would Affleck write The Batman, but would be doing it with DC Comics legend Geoff Johns (the talent fans had downright demanded take a guiding hand in the DCEU). That excitement apparently wore off when a script took longer to form than expected. In recent weeks hyperbole and rumors have spun out of control, implying Affleck hasn’t just lost interest in the film… but that it may not happen at all.



The questions about that Batman script have been coming fast and furious, leading Affleck to – at least to those following the story since the beginning – find clever new ways to repeat the same basic sentiment. In fact, it’s the same one he offered during our interview on the set of Justice League. In short, that whatever Warner Bros. may have planned for a release date, he’s not moving forward until the script passes his “very high bar” for it (and given his clout and role, he’s more able to stand his ground than others).
Yet the cloud of critical bashing remained over the DCEU as a whole after BvS and Suicide Squad, and with each report of a departing director or internal struggle, Affleck faced the same questions. His responses reinforced the notion that the script, while among his priorities, was being given time to gestate: That it was “on the right track,” that he wouldn’t “reverse-engineer projects to meet a release date,” and that there was “not enough money in the world to make a mediocre version of Batman worth it.”





Despite Affleck’s comments, clearly spoken from a creative-over-financial stance, the studio plugged on, stating it would meet its placeholder 2018 release date as reports added that Justice League 2 would be postponed to make room for it. But no matter how many times Affleck stated, re-stated, and re-re-stated the film’s early stage of development, his recent choice of words let the hounds of suspicion and speculation loose: That The Batman movie coming to the DCEU was “not a set thing.” For those who had gotten on board with Affleck’s stance of ‘taking his time to get it right,’ it was another way of wording his refusal to make a bad movie.

But for those who either couldn’t or wouldn’t place the comments in context, it was a bombshell. A comment that, admittedly, implied far less certainty and structure on a studio level (again, to those not aware of his existing stance). But even those unsurprised by the comment, believing the status of the project to be… well, the same as it has been for months, there is a question to ask: Why is The Batman script taking so long to come together? Thankfully, Affleck has answered that question directly. And no, the movie isn’t in the kinds of trouble some are claiming.
While fielding questions (in theory) about his latest film, Live By Night, the topic of The Batman was hard to avoid (the same same junket in which Affleck offered the brief, but positive update of the script being “good and going“). When speaking with IGN on the same topic, Affleck first confirmed that 2016 has been a packed year, with an executive producing and directing workload that left little time for anything else:


“It was a very busy year, yeah. We did the BvS press while I was finishing [post production on Live By Night]. Went right into Justice League… just finished it as I was finishing Justice League, and then had to go into promoting The Accountant, and then go into promoting this. So it’s been a busy year, but it’s very satisfying. I’m proud of all of the movies. I look forward to people seeing Justice League… but it’s a lot of work.”

Considering that workload, and taking Affleck’s claims of wanting to do The Batman right at face value, the script remaining ‘under construction’ isn’t all that surprising. Affleck went a step further, voicing his excitement over the script and project, and reminding everyone that while a Batman update may be more appealing to outlets and fans – and the online traffic those headlines bring – it’s all business as usual, as far as he’s concerned:
“It’s the same thing as any other movie. When I’m excited about it, we’re working on the scripts, when we get there we’re gonna make it. I’m really excited. There’s great stuff in it now, it just needs to get better and better. And it’s the same way I felt about [Live By Night] when I was prepping it, it’s just that no one was asking me questions because nobody gave a s***, because there wasn’t any click-throughs. But it took me a year plus to get this movie ready to launch. Hopefully it won’t take me that long for Batman. But we’re working, I think we’re ahead of the curve, and we’re excited.”
Although the questions are guaranteed to continue, the tone and content of Affleck’s comments are as candid as they are concise. It’s unfortunate that after taking home the Academy Award for Argo, his next directorial outing should be so overshadowed by a film so early in development. But, as Affleck notes, the reality of the projects is different. Where anticipation for Live By Night was focused on the finished film, any and all updates, insights, and descriptors concerning the script are being sought from the very outset. Unfortunately for detail-hungry fans… that doesn’t meant the story takes shape any faster.

It’s hard to imagine any more substantial updates being offered until the script is actually finished, or a working draft is at least submitted to the studio. But we doubt that will stop the online pendulum swinging wildly from fears of the DCEU taking shape before it’s able to bear its own weight, to fears that time spent getting a script to sing is somehow also cause for concern.


Source: IGN
 

manigamer

Respect Ma AuthoritA!!!
Global Mod
Jun 28, 2007
52,087
395
89
On earth...Lahore
[h=1]Ben Affleck Wants a More Comfortable Batsuit for The Batman[/h]




There has been a lot of speculation lately concerning Ben Affleck and whether he’s going to direct The Batman for Warner Bros. Some feel that the film is in trouble as it doesn’t have a script yet, though Affleck maintains that press tours and work on other movies simply kept him too busy to give it the attention it deserves in 2016. Even if he doesn’t have the script where he wants it, though, Affleck has definitely been thinking about what it will take to make the movie happen.
As it turns out, there’s one item in particular that Affleck will need if he’s going to direct The Batman in addition to starring in it. To pull off his dual roles for the film he’s going to need the costuming department to make some changes to the Batsuit.
Speaking with USA Today while doing promotion for his new movie Live by Night, Affleck mentions that he’s going to need to have the Batsuit modified if he does direct The Batman. The current Batsuit design is too difficult to put on and take off, meaning that costume changes after his scenes would take him away from other actors and slow down production. As Affleck explains it:
“I know what’s it’s like to be in the suit. We’ll have to modify the suit to make it a little bit easier to put on and take off. When you are in it, you can be sweating, crazy and exhausted, do your part and walk away. But when you’re a director, you can’t walk away. You have to be there for everybody. … Chief among the challenges of doing Batman, will be finding a suit that’s more comfortable.”





It’s not uncommon for superhero costumes to change between films, sometimes drastically. Batman has had multiple costumes over the years, including the much-hated Batman Forever and Batman & Robin costumes that came complete with bat-nipples. It’s possible that creating a functional change like this wouldn’t alter the overall look drastically, but even if it did, then it could likely be explained away within the story itself.
Fans who hope to see Affleck’s take on a Batman film should see this as good news, as the actor/director is obviously putting a lot of thought into what it will take to pull the movie off. This may all be moot if the script doesn’t come together, but it at least shows that his mindset is shifting from last year’s projects to getting The Batman underway. Perhaps a new suit is just what he needs to get the pieces to all come together for the best Batman film to date.


Source: USA Today (via CinemaBlend)
 

manigamer

Respect Ma AuthoritA!!!
Global Mod
Jun 28, 2007
52,087
395
89
On earth...Lahore
[h=1]Ben Affleck Tired of Batman Questions; Promises ‘Something Special’[/h]

Ever since it was announced that Ben Affleck would be writing, directing and starring in the next Batman standalone, the film has been one of the most anticipated upcoming superhero movies. The DC Extended Universe may have had a rough 2016 – both Batman V Superman: Dawn of Justice and Suicide Squad were poorly reviewed – but with Affleck (being the widely-regarded best thing from both of those films) leading the way, it looked like DC and Warner Bros. may be able to turn that perception around.
Of course, DC films are always the subject of massive speculation and controversy, so it was never going to be as plain sailing as that. The recent release of Affleck’s Live By Night has provided a lot of interview time for the star that’s led to The Batman (if it is indeed called that) being put under the microscope. Following his comments that “it’s not a set thing and there’s no script”, there was a lot of chatter that the film was in dire trouble and Affleck might even drop out as director. Affleck has been quick to hit back on that, decrying the coverage and explaining his hectic schedule.
Following up on the whole affair, Affleck has spoken to Entertainment Tonight Canada (via DCEU Fans) about the stress of the whole thing and given some vague but promising insight into the film’s ideological goals:


“Oh my God, it’s such a pain in the ass. It’s like every time I mention Batman it gets this huge clickbait. When I was doing this movie it took me two years to get it together, but nobody ever asked me ‘where’s Live By Night?’ You know? They ask me ‘Batman, Batman, Batman.’ Batman’s coming along, it’s going to be great. We’re going to make something really special. We’re going to take the time to make it right. We’re going to do it good. We’re going to do it the right way. And the fans are going to love it.”






It’s hard to not feel Affleck’s frustration. Putting aside the inevitable stress of Live By Night‘s release not going all that well, the publicity push has been dogged by questions about his next movie and his honest answers being twisted into inferred production troubles. Taking the quotes at face value, yes, there’s clearly some delays, but putting it in the context of a filmmaker juggling the releases of several directing and acting projects and an emerging franchise trying to balance a heavy slate it makes perfect sense – Affleck is simply taking his time. DCEU movies have been plagued by rumours of production issues before, so Affleck’s approach is to be commended here.
This is all really a result of the sped-up production cycles that we’ve grown accustomed to; superhero franchises are delivering multiple movies a year, so any perceived delay could have a major knock-on effect and is taken as cause for panic. However, there’s never been a set release date (or even an official announcement from the studio) for The Batman and it’s not like we’re light on Caped Crusader action in the meantime; Affleck’s Batman was in two 2016 movies (one that was out less than six months ago) and will be a leading player in Justice League this year too.
In other words: it sounds like things are still slowly coming together on Affleck’s Batman solo outing. If Affleck taking more time to refine the script leads to a better film, then everyone wins.
Source: Entertainment Tonight Canada (via DCEU Fans)
 

manigamer

Respect Ma AuthoritA!!!
Global Mod
Jun 28, 2007
52,087
395
89
On earth...Lahore
[h=1]Did Jared Leto Tease His Return as The Joker?[/h]


Jared Leto made his first DCEU appearance as the Joker in last year’s Suicide Squad – and after an largely negative reaction from fans, there has been no news of when he might reprise the role. As such a major character in the Batman mythology, we can assume that he will be returning at some point in the future of the DCEU, but it looks like the Joker will not be returning for Justice League, although he could appear in either The Batman, or the recently announced Gotham City Sirens movie. While there has been no official announcement of Leto’s return, these two films seem the most likely, as both have direct links to the comic book character.
Despite some unhappiness with scenes being cut and how his take on the Joker was received, it seems that Leto is back on board and ready to return to the DCEU, as the actor posted some images to his Snapchat that hint at his next appearance.
Leto posted two new Joker-related snaps earlier today [h/t Batman News]. The first is a cropped close-up of the cover of Batman: The Killing Joke, a controversial 1988 comic starring the Joker. The second is a photo of what appears to be a human tooth turned into a pendant for a necklace. The tooth is capped with gold metal, and is sitting in a purple velvet box with Gucci printed on the inside.


Jared Leto just shared these photos on Snapchat. What does it all mean?! pic.twitter.com/BkZUmpFqZQ
— Batman-News.com (@BatmanNewsCom) January 18, 2017


Batman: The Killing Joke, often considered to be the definitive Joker origin story, takes place in two timelines. One tells the early days of the Joker in flashback. A failed comedian with a pregnant wife, he is driven to insanity and a life of crime. The second timeline takes place in the present day, as the Joker attempts to drive Commissioner Gordon insane, and famously shoots and paralyzes Barbara Gordon in the process. Posting a close-up of this cover suggests that Leto’s next appearance as the Joker may include elements of the storyline or themes from this comic, or perhaps that it will deal with the Joker’s origins in the DCEU.
The second image of the tooth jewelry also points to a potential origin story for the Joker. In Suicide Squad, Leto’s Joker wears a metal grill, which most fans assume is the result of his teeth being knocked out by Batman. If this jewelry is made from one of his own teeth, perhaps we will see the fight in which the Joker lost his, after which he decided to turn at least one into decoration.
These snaps are good news for fans of Leto’s Joker, as they seem to suggest that he will not be relegated to some dusty corner of the DCEU following his poor initial reception. This also gives us a hint about potential storylines for The Batman, as it would make sense for this to be the vehicle for Joker’s return. A Killing Joke-inspired Batman movie would certainly be an interesting choice for the DCEU’s first Batman solo outing – it would turn the clock back for the character and provide some backstory, without going so far back as to create yet another Batman origin movie. In addition, seeing this storyline would mean getting to see Jenna Malone’s Barbara Gordon, which was cut out of Batman V Superman to the disappointment of many fans.
Of course, for the many fans who were less than impressed with Leto’s Joker, the idea of him as a key part of either The Batman or Gotham City Sirens is not encouraging. Luckily for them, this is far from a confirmation of Leto’s immediate return. The images may well be connected to a cameo elsewhere in the DCEU, or be connected to absolutely nothing but Leto’s own perspective on the Joker. It certainly looks like this is the actor teasing his return, but until that is confirmed, we won’t be getting too worked up about the possibility.
Source: Batman News
 

manigamer

Respect Ma AuthoritA!!!
Global Mod
Jun 28, 2007
52,087
395
89
On earth...Lahore
[h=1]Ben Affleck Will Not Direct The Batman Solo Movie[/h]

It’s been a rough road for the DC movie universe – and now The Batman solo movie has lost its director. A new report suggests that Ben Affleck, who was slated to produce, write, direct, and star in the film is stepping aside. The news comes following a steady stream of reassuring updates on The Batman from the filmmaker while out promoting his latest film – while rumors of Affleck’s potential exit from the director’s chair loomed in the background.
Now, thanks to a report at Variety, we know that Affleck is officially stepping down as director — leaving fans to wonder who will step in and direct the solo movie as well as how involved in the DCEU this Batman will be post-Justice League.
In the meantime, Affleck has issued a statement on why he’s stepping down — suggesting that, out of respect for the role, he cannot dedicate necessary focus to serve as director, actor, and writer:


There are certain characters who hold a special place in the hearts of millions. Performing this role demands focus, passion and the very best performance I can give. It has become clear that I cannot do both jobs to the level they require. Together with the studio, I have decided to find a partner in a director who will collaborate with me on this massive film. I am still in this, and we are making it, but we are currently looking for a director. I remain extremely committed to this project, and look forward to bringing this to life for fans around the world.”
For their part, Warner Bros. is standing behind Affleck’s decision:
“Warner Bros. fully supports Ben Affleck’s decision and remains committed to working with him to bring a standalone Batman picture to life.”





The news that Affleck will no longer direct The Batman is sure to provoke many strong responses, both from those who’ve loved the DCEU output to date, and from those who’ve found themselves leaving the theater underwhelmed.
Despite the notably divisive reaction to last year’s Batman V Superman: Dawn of Justice, one thing both sides seemed to mostly agree on is that Affleck performed pretty well as as the Caped Crusader, as well as his billionaire alter ego Bruce Wayne. That positive sentiment, combined with Affleck’s award-winning history as a director led many to believe that he was the right man to steer the Dark Knight ship going forward.
On the other hand, film history is littered with examples of actors turned directors whose on-screen work suffered, presumably due to stretching themselves too thin. Such issues would probably hold doubly true when trying to both direct and star in a big-budget mega blockbuster like The Batman. Based on his statement above, Affleck is clearly fully aware of such hurdles, which likely played a large role in him ultimately choosing to step aside as director. Now, the hunt is on for the person ready to pick up where Affleck left off.


Source: Variety


-------

frack man, i bet those WB aholes made him do this, i mean fast tracking the batman movie where he didn't think the script was good enough etc... damn this is NOT GOOD.
 

manigamer

Respect Ma AuthoritA!!!
Global Mod
Jun 28, 2007
52,087
395
89
On earth...Lahore
[h=1]The Batman: Matt Reeves Reportedly on Director Short List[/h]

The news that Ben Affleck would step down as director of The Batman may have come as a surprise to some, but it wasn’t exactly without warning. Over the past several weeks, the Academy Award-winner had offered up a few quotes that left some questioning whether or not he would actually wind up helming the solo superhero adventure, or if he might pass those responsibilities off to someone else. As it turns out, the latter was true, proving those who parsed Affleck’s comments right.
The question now is: Who will step in to fill Affleck’s shoes as director? The task may be daunting, but naturally there are several popular choices who will no doubt be fan favorites to direct this current DCEU incarnation of the Dark Knight. As it turns out, though, Warner Bros. may already have a short list of potential candidates lined-up, with a familiar name reportedly high on that list.
According to Variety, Matt Reeves, director of War For the Planet of the Apes, Dawn of the Planet of the Apes, and Cloverfield is a top candidate to take the reins on the upcoming film and help steer the DCEU toward critical and commercial success.
Hearing Matt Reeves is high on the list of directors they are looking at
— Justin Kroll (@krolljvar) January 31, 2017
Reeves is a solid choice for the studio, as he has demonstrated a knack for delivering character-driven genre films since the aforementioned Cloverfield in 2008. Since then, Reeves has tackled increasingly ambitious projects with the budgets and special effects to match. His 2010 follow-up was Let Me In, a remake of the Swedish vampire film Let the Right One In, which was well-received with critics. More importantly, though, the film demonstrated the director’s ability to craft an engrossing tale within the confines of not only a U.S. remake but also the sometimes stifling limitations of the horror genre as well.
Reeves’ most recent efforts — the last two installments of the new Planet of the Apes franchise — offer further proof that he’s a solid choice to step in as Affleck takes a step back. The success of Dawn and the anticipation surrounding this summer’s War of the Planet of the Apes are a good indication of Reeves’ ability to run with the baton once it’s been passed his way, as he did when taking over for then-departing director Rupert Wyatt.
The success Reeves has had delivering big-budget crowd-pleasers that also turn a tidy profit makes him attractive to from a studio standpoint. Perhaps more importantly, though, Reeves has signaled an ability to collaborate not only a director but also as a writer — which he did by helping Mark Bomback script the most recent Apes film — making him an appealing partner for both Ben Affleck and Warner Bros.


Source: Variety
 

Gintoki

Seasoned
Oct 28, 2009
2,781
1
43
Left Pakgamers
[MENTION=507]manigamer[/MENTION] Nah, Ben was feeling the pressure. Ben is already frustrated people ask about the batman movie all the time, he couldnt take it
 

Leon

Seasoned
Feb 26, 2009
3,127
529
129
This is sad actually. Ben is a better Director than an actor.
They should get Frank Miller or Tim Miller involved into the Batman movie to make it the best.

Sent from my Infinix_X521 using Tapatalk
 

Bankabilla

Intermediate
Jul 5, 2009
113
0
22
Damn,that is not good.But Matt Reeves is a great choice as well and if they go for Jerry bruckheimer,he is good too.Personally would like Matt Reeves on this.
 

Ibbu Bhai

Team Underground
Feb 25, 2010
2,909
0
41
38
Lahore
Instead of Jared Leto they should cast Cameron Monaghan as a Joker since this guy has way more potential for Joker's character. Although Jared Leto is also a great Actor but he looses that Joker role as well as charisma.

If Lex Luthor character can be casted as a young villain/mad man then why shouldn't this guy.

Now just simply look at this Gotham (Joker) poster man he fits this character perfectly.

 

Leon

Seasoned
Feb 26, 2009
3,127
529
129
Instead of Jared Leto they should cast Cameron Monaghan as a Joker since this guy has way more potential for Joker's character. Although Jared Leto is also a great Actor but he looses that Joker role as well as charisma.

If Lex Luthor character can be casted as a young villain/mad man then why shouldn't this guy.

Now just simply look at this Gotham (Joker) poster man he fits this character perfectly.

This guy is an upcoming legend but the age factor between Affleck and Cameron is too much.
Joker and Batman are almost the same age in every story as you can see in Gotham as well.

Sent from my Infinix_X521 using Tapatalk
 

Ibbu Bhai

Team Underground
Feb 25, 2010
2,909
0
41
38
Lahore
This guy is an upcoming legend but the age factor between Affleck and Cameron is too much.
Joker and Batman are almost the same age in every story as you can see in Gotham as well.

Sent from my Infinix_X521 using Tapatalk
I agree but what about Lex Luthor he was also a young lad, anyhow this guy definitely deserves a chance.
 

Gintoki

Seasoned
Oct 28, 2009
2,781
1
43
Left Pakgamers
Jared Leto's Joker was shit. Everytime he came on screen, it wasn't anything special. Cameron's Joker is the best one so far in live action.
 

manigamer

Respect Ma AuthoritA!!!
Global Mod
Jun 28, 2007
52,087
395
89
On earth...Lahore
[h=1]Why Matt Reeves Should Direct The Batman[/h]



Warner Bros. and the DC Extended Universe have been sailing through choppy waters for the past year. After Batman V Superman: Dawn of Justice and its DCEU companion Suicide Squad received a plethora of negative reviews, the studio has had to fend of rumors of behind the scenes drama and general complaints from moviegoers about the direction of the DCEU. The situation wasn’t helped by Rick Famuyiwa stepping down as director on The Flash due to creative differences last year; a decision that came several months after the project’s original director, Seth Grahame-Smith, left the project for similar reasons.
Now, to add further problems to the mix, Ben Affleck has announced that is stepping down from directing The Batman; though he is still headlining/producing the film and, until further notice, co-writing the script. Affleck is also coming off having directed Live By Night for Warner Bros., a film that proven to be both a critical and commercial bust; fueling speculation that Affleck wasn’t able to properly finish the film while balancing his Bruce Wayne responsibilities (see: promoting Batman V Superman and starring in Justice League), last year. Whatever the case, Affleck seems more comfortable being directed in The Batman than pulling double duty as star and helmsman, leaving DC with the task of finding a director who is willing to take on the challenge of directing The Batman instead.


The top name currently reported to be on WB/DC’s shortlist for replacement directors on The Batman is Matt Reeves, director of Cloverfield and Dawn of the Planet of the Apes. Moreover, given the current circumstances and the state of the DCEU right now, Reeves feels like the most sensible choice possible here.
Reeves started his directorial career alongside his collaborator J.J. Abrams, with whom he co-created the TV show Felicity and directed several episodes. After a few years of television focused work, he made his big screen directorial debut with Cloverfield, which Abrams produced. The film has since spawned a franchise but before that, Cloverfield was a mid-budget found footage monster film that surprised critics and made over $170m at the box office. While his follow-up, the American remake of Let The Right One In, disappointed financially, Reeves bounced back four years later by taking over the Planet of the Apes franchise, leading Dawn to become the 8th highest-grossing film of 2014 and one of the best reviewed movies of the year. Guy Lodge of Variety singled out Reeves’s work on the film as “conducting the proceedings with more assertive genre elan than Rise journeyman Rupert Wyatt”, so it’s no wonder Reeves was re-signed by Fox to helm and co-write this year’s War for the Planet of the Apes.


Matt Reeves and Andy Serkis on the Dawn of the Planet of the Apes set




Reeves is not exactly a major name, but he’s made a number of profitable movies and has been praised for his ability to handle effects-heavy storytelling without sacrificing character or theme. Dawn of the Planet of the Apes not only changed tone dramatically from its predecessor (moving closer to a war film in its ambitions), it explores the emotional beats of its ape ensemble in great depth; developing them far beyond their admittedly-impressive CGI work (which in and of itself elevated the already stunning work of the first film to dazzling new heights of immersion). Dawn is a cerebral yet deeply empathetic story of the sacrifices of war that just happens to feature humanoid chimps on horseback with guns. It may not be defined as “A Matt Reeves movie”, but it is thanks to the work of Reeves that it can stand tall as a great film.
Perhaps that’s exactly what DC needs right now after Batman V Superman and Suicide Squad, two grim films that bear the fingerprints of Zack Snyder all over them. DC arguably made a mistake in allowing a single filmmaker (and, perhaps more importantly, a controversial one in the geek community) to majorly define the visual and emotional tone of their multi-billion dollar franchise. While Reeves may not be able to completely balance out the problems inherent to DC and Warner Brothers’ DCEU, his experience in big-budget projects, some of which rival a Batman movie in terms of scope and cost, give him sturdier foundations to work with than some of DC’s other director choices. Affleck’s concerns seem to lie in handling those pressures on The Batman, but with Reeves, his record speaks for himself.






Reeves is the kind of director Hollywood is often keen to work with but seldom give deserved credit to. He is not an auteur of distinction, nor is his work imbued with stylistic quirks or trademark signs, but he has the skills and command to take on major projects with technical flourish and kinetic energy – while still working within the parameters of the studio’s limitations.
He seems to understand how such movies are made, not just on a technical and storytelling level, but as a cog in the wider industry machine. There is no doubt that The Batman will be a movie that’s test-screened at every possible opportunity, and whoever is helming the multi-million dollar tent-pole will be inundated with producer notes, time constraints and demands from its leading man, who will retain at least a “story by” credit, if not a full screenwriter one. This is not a story Warner Brothers will be keen to let someone “put their stamp on”, more so since publicity efforts to make Suicide Squad and Justice League seem lighter in tone to audiences tired of the more grim approach favored by Snyder.
That is why Reeves would be a strong choice for Warner Brothers to make, going forward with the Batman series. He has the prerequisite experience studios crave from their blockbuster directors but is also savvy enough to keep within the borders of the often-smothering studio system; something even greats like Joss Whedon have struggled with. Batman is a character whose adaptations have often been helmed by auteur types – Tim Burton and Christopher Nolan – which must have made the prospect tempting for an Oscar-winner like Affleck, but sometimes experience and technical proficiency matter more than earnest but unattainable ambition. While an official announcement may not be made for a while, WB could use a steady port in the storm, and Matt Reeves could provide the calm they need.
 

manigamer

Respect Ma AuthoritA!!!
Global Mod
Jun 28, 2007
52,087
395
89
On earth...Lahore
[h=1]James Gunn Wants Green Room Director to Helm The Batman[/h]

This week the comic book movie landscape has been shaken by the news that Ben Affleck is no longer directing The Batman. He’ll still be producing and starring in the DCEU standalone feature, but his departure from the director’s chair after months of speculation about the development of the film’s script is a big knock to one of the most anticipated upcoming superhero films.
With Affleck out and saying in his official statement “I have decided to find a partner in a director who will collaborate with me on this massive film”, the big question on everyone’s lips is who’s going to be replacing him. The original Variety report cited that Matt Reeves (Cloverfield, Dawn of the Planet of the Apes) was on Warner Bros’ shortlist and later rumors have suggested Gavin O’Connor (The Accountant), Denis Villeneuve (Sicario, Arrival) and George Miller (Mad Max), while plenty of other excellent candidates have been floated by fans.
Other film directors are throwing their opinions in the ring too. During a Facebook Q&A, Guardians of the Galaxy helmer James Gunn was asked who he thought should take the job and responded with Jeremy Saulnier, the man behind cult hits Blue Ruin and Green Room:
“If Jeremy Saulnier was interested he’d be a good choice.”





Saulnier broke big with brutal revenge showcase Blue Ruin in 2013 and cemented his position as a master of intense, uncompromising thrillers with last year’s Green Room. Following a punk rock band going up against a gang of neo-Nazis after they see something they shouldn’t, it was one of 2016’s most horrifically violent films. Saulnier’s currently working on an adaptation of thriller Hold The Dark for Netflix due in 2018. Whether this means he’d be available for The Batman or not depends on the sort of release date Warners are circling, but he’d certainly be an interesting choice.
Someone best known for gasp-inducing violence and expertly-mounted tension is far from the conventional choice to replace Affleck, but then Christopher Nolan wasn’t the obvious pick in the early 2000s and he made three excellent Bat-flicks. Those showed it’s possible to take an edgy indie style and successfully apply it to bigger budget films (something Gunn also know from personal experience, having made the leap from gritty films like Super and Slither to one of Marvel’s biggest hits). However, with Saulnier rather inexperienced on a blockbuster stage – Green Room was his most expensive movie at $5 million – and DC looking towards more established names with its Extended Universe so far, his Batman is unlikely to make it out of Gunn’s imagination.
Still, the director’s comments are rather refreshing given how they go against the somewhat vitriolic rivalry between Marvel and DC. And it’s not just fans online; David Ayer famously shouted “F*ck Marvel” at Suicide Squad‘s world premiere. Gunn giving a measured response is a calm addressing of the divide and an acknowledgment that superhero success benefits both sides.
Source: James Gunn
 
General chit-chat
Help Users
We have disabled traderscore and are working on a fix. There was a bug with the plugin | Click for Discord
  • No one is chatting at the moment.
  • NaNoW NaNoW:
    skyrim
    Link
  • NaNoW NaNoW:
    is one game, 10 releases
    Link
  • NaNoW NaNoW:
    GTA 5
    Link
  • faraany3k faraany3k:
    Which Franchise has 5 releases but only two games. Last of Us
    Link
  • faraany3k faraany3k:
    Shadowdragoo said:
    no idea how that is a steal by wasting 3500 rupees per month and for games that are removed before you can finish them off.xbox gamepass is garbage with no local prices
    why you are paying american rates in Pakistan. Search cheaper region like Turkey. 13k for 13 months. Ms does not care
    Link
  • Link
  • S Shadowdragoo:
    no idea how that is a steal by wasting 3500 rupees per month and for games that are removed before you can finish them off.xbox gamepass is garbage with no local prices
    Link
  • faraany3k faraany3k:
    Just finished Diablo 4 season in hurry to play Fallout 4 but gamepass released another banger in the form of Star Wars on April 25th. Gamepass is a steal man.
    Link
  • Necrokiller Necrokiller:
    EternalBlizzard said:
    Is it just me or people lately seem to defend every bad game design decision made by the devs and try to give bullshit reasons for that? Or perhaps it's because I'm on reddit and discord :ROFLMAO:
    There are no such thing as "bad design" bro, its all "artistic vision" now :ROFLMAO:
    • Haha
    Reactions: EternalBlizzard
    Link
  • EternalBlizzard EternalBlizzard:
    Is it just me or people lately seem to defend every bad game design decision made by the devs and try to give bullshit reasons for that? Or perhaps it's because I'm on reddit and discord :ROFLMAO:
    • Haha
    Reactions: Necrokiller
    Link
  • B Baghi:
    vos
    Link
  • Link
  • G gorillageneral:
    It's me cattoboee
    Link
  • G gorillageneral:
    It's me tattooed
    Link
  • Link
  • C cattoboee:
    testing
    Link
  • NaNoW NaNoW:
    true
    Link
  • faraany3k faraany3k:
    Add 20 years into your age. Congrats you are in Playstation 8 era. Probably a VR streaming headset in a form of glasses.
    Link
  • S Shehryar89:
    Hi any repair shop for Nintendo Switch in Isb/ Rwp? The console is not charging. Anybody? Who can help in this regard.
    Link
  • iampasha iampasha:
    Ewww brother ewww, what's that brother? Whats that?
    Link
  • Necrokiller Necrokiller:
    Senua Saga 30fps both on Series S and X. Gotta feel bad for the Series X owners.
    Link
  • Necrokiller Necrokiller:
    Imagine buying a Pro console and still getting 30fps in GTA 6 😬
    Link
  • faraany3k faraany3k:
    So this console gen was like putting a SSD in an old laptop
    Link
  • LordIT LordIT:
    does anyone know a reliable vendor in lahore for laptop batteries?
    Link
  • XPremiuM XPremiuM:
    I remember when PG used to be such an active site. Now it's barely alive.
    Link
    NaNoW NaNoW: skyrim