The results came as a surprise to the student researchers who had expected their research to confirm that gender bias in software development was overwhelmingly prejudiced against code written by women. While the study paper has yet to be peer reviewed, the results are still intriguing.
The authors examined “pull requests” on GitHub, one of the largest and most well-known open source software development communities in the world. They looked specifically at the behaviour of coders. The researchers studied how women programmers are treated on GitHub, using a variety of different methods.The researchers found that despite 92% of software developers being men, the small number of female coders were proportionally more likely to have their work approved and viewed favourably on GitHub, as long as they didn’t actually identify themselves as women.
[h=4]The study’s authors wrote:[/h]“Our results show that women’s contributions tend to be accepted more often than men’s…However, when a woman’s gender is identifiable, they are rejected more often.Our results suggest that although women on GitHub may be more competent overall, bias against them exists nonetheless.”