Equinix, on singtel and TMNET things were even worse + packet loss @ peak.Provider meaning singtel correct? So the only way forward with that would be to hope that singtel increases its capacity on that link yeah?
Not all regions, ours is still very very playable @ <200ms. Philippines have it even worse i.e. from 60ms-500msdang.
so for things to return to 80ms all day and not just before evenings one would have to hope for either of those three providers to increase the capacity on their links ? If that is the case then it is ALL regions connecting to sgp that experience the increase in latency in the evening right?
I'm really confused about this huge difference in latency to SEA 1 between PTCL and Connect.net
Here is a tracert on PTCL:
Same server on Connect:
Both screenshots were taken around 11PM.
Would be really great if someone could explain this(sorry if it has already been asked before).
Here is another screenshot on PTCL but with a 39.XX.XX.XX IP
Usually this IP used to give lower ping than the 182.XXX.XXX.XX one but doesn't seem to be the case anymore.
39 pool isn't getting advertised properly, its going to Europe then back.... message https://twitter.com/PTCLCares about it.It's ironic because connect buys bandwidth from PTCL
while it should be:
1 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms 6762.sgw.equinix.com (202.79.197.111) 2 302 ms 277 ms 271 ms pakistan-telecom.palermo16.pal.seabone.net (195.22.197.119) 3 274 ms 270 ms * static-10GE-KHI275-P01-SwA.pie.net.pk (202.125.128.173) 4 278 ms 277 ms 277 ms khi77.ptcl.net.pk (221.120.251.158) 5 270 ms 271 ms 262 ms 203.99.170.146 6 294 ms 299 ms 302 ms 10.1.1.5 7 301 ms 299 ms 321 ms 10.0.2.6 8 * * * ? 9 303 ms 299 ms * 10.80.80.5
1 5 ms 4 ms 2 ms p17557.sgw.equinix.com (202.79.197.83) 2 74 ms 74 ms 74 ms KHI275GW1B.pie.net.pk (202.125.129.221) 3 78 ms 75 ms 76 ms static-10GE-KHI275-P01-SwB.pie.net.pk (202.125.128.156) 4 102 ms 99 ms 100 ms rwp44.pie.net.pk (221.120.254.37) 5 99 ms 99 ms 99 ms rwp44.pie.net.pk (221.120.253.218) 6 112 ms 107 ms 106 ms 182.184.23.169 7 111 ms 105 ms 105 ms 10.0.2.6 8 100 ms 100 ms 100 ms 182.176.8.13 9 113 ms 106 ms 106 ms 182.176.100.12
NopeI've been getting excellent pings on SEA servers since last night. Every game (about 7 or 8 games) I got decent ping, that is 130 to 200. Not a single 300+ server today.
@Itachi, I just did a tracert and my route has as many hops as yours, and the second last hop (habib-rafiq) to last hop time is less than a couple of milliseconds, whereas in your case its taking almost 350ms.
That's Valve's fault there I think.
that explains the issue with the 39 pool but why does Connect get lower ping to SEA than PTCL when connect itself uses PTCL's backbone ?39.32.0.0/11, 39.32.0.0/16, 39.47.0.0/17, 39.40.0.0/13 etc (all PTCL 39.x prefixes) are not being advertised properly. This is the path they're taking on all of these prefixes:
while it should be:
Load balancing? Corporate takes precedence? Also there are minimal local losses so connect KHI users get LOW ping. Some KHI PTCL users also get low ping (<90ms).that explains the issue with the 39 pool but why does Connect get lower ping to SEA than PTCL when connect itself uses PTCL's backbone ?
[MENTION=12082]GrunT[/MENTION] [MENTION=11094]StrikerX[/MENTION]
I have a 39 series IP... Here's my tracert. Take a look at the last hop. Almost no time at all whereas in your case it takes north of 250ms.
.
C:\Users\Shoaib>tracert sgp-1.valve.net
Tracing route to sgp-1.valve.net [103.28.54.1]
over a maximum of 30 hops:
1 4 ms 9 ms 2 ms 172.24.41.1
2 27 ms 31 ms 34 ms 203.99.169.18
3 45 ms 50 ms 32 ms 10.0.4.1
4 39 ms 25 ms 26 ms 203.99.170.145
5 28 ms 26 ms 35 ms static-10GE-KHI275-PO1-PE01.pie.net.pk [221.120.
251.157]
6 29 ms 26 ms 26 ms Sw275b-khi77c1.pie.net.pk [202.125.128.133]
7 116 ms 118 ms 118 ms khi77.pie.net.pk [202.125.129.222]
8 119 ms 119 ms 118 ms sgp-1.valve.net [103.28.54.1]
Trace complete.
[COLOR=#500050][FONT=arial]
[/FONT][/COLOR][FONT=arial][FONT=verdana] 1 1 ms 1 ms 2 ms [URL="http://fn149-static9.fariya.com/"]fn149-static9.fariya.com[/URL] [14.192.149.9]
2 25 ms 6 ms 6 ms 192.168.229.1
3 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms [URL="http://tw128-static181.tw1.com/"]tw128-static181.tw1.com[/URL] [119.63.128.181]
4 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 110.93.253.117
5 306 ms 305 ms 306 ms 203.208.175.149
6 127 ms 128 ms 127 ms 203.208.190.206
7 131 ms 133 ms 131 ms [URL="http://unknown.hwng.net/"]unknown.hwng.net[/URL] [173.245.210.222]
8 132 ms 136 ms 134 ms [URL="http://sgp-1.valve.net/"]sgp-1.valve.net[/URL] [103.28.54.1][/FONT]
[/FONT][COLOR=#500050][FONT=arial]
[/FONT][/COLOR]
[FONT=verdana] 1 45 ms 17 ms 4 ms [URL="http://fn129-static5.fariya.com/"]fn129-static5.fariya.com[/URL] [14.192.129.5]
2 1 ms 2 ms 2 ms [URL="http://fn158-static57.fariya.com/"]fn158-static57.fariya.com[/URL] [14.192.158.57]
3 <1 ms <1 ms 1 ms [URL="http://fn158-static129.fariya.com/"]fn158-static129.fariya.com[/URL] [URL="tel:%5B14.192.158.129"][14.192.158.129[/URL]]
4 48 ms 52 ms 47 ms [URL="http://khi77.pie.net.pk/"]khi77.pie.net.pk[/URL] [221.120.205.149]
5 4 ms 2 ms 4 ms 221.120.251.29
6 2 ms 2 ms 2 ms [URL="http://sw275b-khi77c1.pie.net.pk/"]Sw275b-khi77c1.pie.net.pk[/URL] [202.125.128.133]
7 77 ms 79 ms 80 ms [URL="http://habib-rafiq.khi77d2.pie.net.pk/"]habib-rafiq.khi77d2.pie.net.pk[/URL] [202.125.129.218]
[/FONT][FONT=arial][FONT=verdana]8 71 ms 71 ms 71 ms [URL="http://sgp-1.valve.net/"]sgp-1.valve.net[/URL] [103.28.54.1][/FONT]
[/FONT]
Checking, gimme 5min.Mine is PTCL 10 mb from my office in PECHS with 39.44 Ip Pool here is the tracert...
[./code] tags, easier on the eyes :)
[MENTION=9638]shoby80[/MENTION]
Alright, so didn't double check this yesterday so sorry about that. Its not IP pool specific, its dynamically load balancing where one path (100ms one) is going directly to equinix SG from PTCL whereas the alternate path is via seabone which is adding 100ms added latency (as of now @ non peak).
[CODE]C:\Users\Umair>tracert [B][COLOR="#FF0000"]103.10.124.1[/COLOR][/B]
Tracing route to sgp-2.valve.net [103.10.124.1]
over a maximum of 30 hops:
1 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms 192.168.1.1
2 39 ms 12 ms * 39.32.0.1
3 * * * Request timed out.
4 8 ms 8 ms 8 ms 10.0.2.2
5 32 ms 32 ms 32 ms 203.99.170.250
6 34 ms 35 ms 35 ms rwp44.pie.net.pk [221.120.253.221]
7 34 ms 36 ms 35 ms rwp44.pie.net.pk [221.120.254.30]
8 32 ms 32 ms 32 ms static-khi-ni02-swa.pie.net.pk [202.125.128.180]
9 107 ms 110 ms 108 ms habib-rafiq.khi77d2.pie.net.pk [202.125.129.218]
10 * * * Request timed out.
11 102 ms 102 ms 104 ms sgp-2.valve.net [103.10.124.1]
Trace complete.
C:\Users\Umair>tracert [B][COLOR="#FF0000"]103.28.54.1[/COLOR][/B]
Tracing route to sgp-1.valve.net [103.28.54.1]
over a maximum of 30 hops:
1 1 ms <1 ms <1 ms 192.168.1.1
2 11 ms 9 ms * 39.32.0.1
3 * * * Request timed out.
4 8 ms 8 ms 7 ms 10.0.2.2
5 55 ms 47 ms 93 ms 203.99.170.250
6 36 ms 35 ms 35 ms rwp44.pie.net.pk [221.120.253.25]
7 36 ms 35 ms 35 ms rwp44.pie.net.pk [221.120.254.30]
8 32 ms 32 ms 32 ms static-khi-ni02-swa.pie.net.pk [202.125.128.180]
9 113 ms 110 ms 108 ms habib-rafiq.khi77d2.pie.net.pk [202.125.129.218]
10 103 ms 102 ms 102 ms sgp-1.valve.net [103.28.54.1]
Trace complete.
why you are paying american rates in Pakistan. Search cheaper region like Turkey. 13k for 13 months. Ms does not careShadowdragoo said:no idea how that is a steal by wasting 3500 rupees per month and for games that are removed before you can finish them off.xbox gamepass is garbage with no local prices
There are no such thing as "bad design" bro, its all "artistic vision" nowEternalBlizzard said:Is it just me or people lately seem to defend every bad game design decision made by the devs and try to give bullshit reasons for that? Or perhaps it's because I'm on reddit and discord