Swift: Go to a Suzuki dealership and drive both the MT Swift and the AT (its a 4-speed auto) Swift and you'll know why the AT variant is pathetic. It lags a lot in acceleration, irregular shifting etc. I said its pathetic because there is a 180 difference in the 'drive joy' of the MT and AT variant which shouldn't be the case.
Belta 1.0: Simply because that specific 1.0 engine is crappy and shouldn't be in a Sedan car, its good as long as its in Vitz! because of the weight difference between a Sedan (Belta) and a Hatchback (Vitz).
Baki there are definitely pros and cons of both the cars, mostly build quality related on Swift but STILL its a decent car (like I said in the thread, considering its made by PakSuzuki, its decent compared to there other cars).
Belta 1.0: Simply because that specific 1.0 engine is crappy and shouldn't be in a Sedan car, its good as long as its in Vitz! because of the weight difference between a Sedan (Belta) and a Hatchback (Vitz).
Baki there are definitely pros and cons of both the cars, mostly build quality related on Swift but STILL its a decent car (like I said in the thread, considering its made by PakSuzuki, its decent compared to there other cars).