• Amused
  • Angry
  • Bored
  • Busy
  • Cheeky
  • Cold
  • Confused
  • Cool
  • Devilish
  • Fine
  • Hacker
  • Happy
  • In Love
  • Innocent
  • Lonely
  • Nerdy
  • Pensive
  • Roflol
  • Sad
  • Starving
  • Stressed
  • Yeehaw
  • Thanks Thanks:  0
    Results 1 to 9 of 9

    Thread: Trader score not showing correctly

    1. #1
      PG Veteran

      I am:
      ----
       
      MainMy Activity InfoMy PG Info
      Posts
      170
      Daily Activity
      0%
      Lv. Percent
      15.9%

      Trader score not showing correctly

      Dear Admins,

      My trader score shows as "9" whereas i have 11 positive score. Please correct it. Thank you

    2. #2
      PG Juggernaut

      I am:
      Confused
       
      Steam ID: mbk0076
      MainMy Activity InfoMy PG Info
      Posts
      2,177
      Daily Activity
      0%
      Lv. Percent
      39.2%
      9 is correct as 11 would be your overall trade score, when you would have dealt with same seller again, a rating msg would be displayed but it won't be added to your trade score.

      For example if you dealed with Janasheen for the very first time then a trade score would be added to your tradescore, but if you deal with him again some time later and you recive a trade score, then it won't be added to your trade score unless a negative feedback (which is displayed on your post but it would be counted on your overall trade score).

      Sent from my SM-G610F using Tapatalk

    3. #3
      Global Moderator
        murtaza12's Avatar
      Global Moderator

      I am:
      Busy
       
      MainMy Activity InfoMy PG Info
      Posts
      10,247
      Daily Activity
      7985.71%
      Lv. Percent
      14.66%
      Quote Originally Posted by MrDard View Post
      Dear Admins,

      My trader score shows as "9" whereas i have 11 positive score. Please correct it. Thank you
      My TS shows as 35, but I actually have 40.

      Tradescores from the same user only count once.

      Sent from my SM-G965F

    4. #4
      PG Veteran

      I am:
      ----
       
      MainMy Activity InfoMy PG Info
      Posts
      170
      Daily Activity
      0%
      Lv. Percent
      15.9%
      This is such an unfair system. You need to trade with different people to get a score!!

      The score should be based on individual transactions, irrespective of the trader.

    5. #5
      Global Moderator
        murtaza12's Avatar
      Global Moderator

      I am:
      Busy
       
      MainMy Activity InfoMy PG Info
      Posts
      10,247
      Daily Activity
      7985.71%
      Lv. Percent
      14.66%
      Quote Originally Posted by MrDard View Post
      This is such an unfair system. You need to trade with different people to get a score!!

      The score should be based on individual transactions, irrespective of the trader.
      Think of it this way, if you're buying a car from a used car dealer and that dealer has sold 50+ cars, but all to the same guy, who could possibly be a friend in real life or whatever. Would you buy a car from him just based on the review of one guy or would you rather hear from multiple people that he's legit?

      The amount of ratings does go up, the score itself does not. That's how it works, that's how it's always been.

    6. #6
      nuub.
        AbbY's Avatar
      NuubAdmin

      I am:
      Starving
       
      MainMy Activity InfoMy PG Info
      Posts
      6,402
      Daily Activity
      0%
      Lv. Percent
      85.16%
      Quote Originally Posted by MrDard View Post
      This is such an unfair system. You need to trade with different people to get a score!!

      The score should be based on individual transactions, irrespective of the trader.
      There are two scores that you have.

      One, is the Trader Score itself, which represents how many POSITIVE deals you have had with UNIQUE sellers/buyers. On the other hand, there is a TOTAL transaction counter, which gets an increment depending on the positive deals you have even if it be with the same buyer. It can be found in the iTrader section of your profile.

      It's not an unfair system. In fact, it's quite the opposite. It's the best way to build 'credibility', and we have had it for almost a decade now....
      1337

    7. #7
      PG Veteran

      I am:
      ----
       
      MainMy Activity InfoMy PG Info
      Posts
      170
      Daily Activity
      0%
      Lv. Percent
      15.9%
      Thank you for the clarification Murtaza12 and Abby

    8. #8
      Administrator
        NaNoW's Avatar

      I am:
      Starving
       
      PSN ID: Wajhi Steam ID: NaNoW
      MainMy Activity InfoMy PG Info
      Posts
      10,696
      Daily Activity
      0%
      Lv. Percent
      69.97%
      Quote Originally Posted by MrDard View Post
      This is such an unfair system. You need to trade with different people to get a score!!

      The score should be based on individual transactions, irrespective of the trader.

      Either we can count every single trader as +1 or we can count every unique trade as +1

      I think the system is more robust and better (and less chance to "cheat" the system) if we count every unique trade as 1+
      Likes assasin42o liked this post
       



    9. #9
      nuub.
        AbbY's Avatar
      NuubAdmin

      I am:
      Starving
       
      MainMy Activity InfoMy PG Info
      Posts
      6,402
      Daily Activity
      0%
      Lv. Percent
      85.16%
      By the way, ebay uses the same method of calculating score...
      1337

     

     

    Tags for this Thread

    Posting Permissions

    • You may not post new threads
    • You may not post replies
    • You may not post attachments
    • You may not edit your posts
    •  
    All times are GMT +5. The time now is 08:45 PM.


    Back to Top Search Engine Optimisation provided by DragonByte SEO (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2019 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
    Shoutbox provided by vBShout (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2019 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
    Copyright 2018 PakGamers. All rights reserved.