[NBA] i5 3570k vs i5 2500k

[mave3]

Ivy is a better option if u are looking for clock to clock performance..
but if u wanna do some serious overclocking then its better to stick with the i2500k coz its a monster when u overclock that beast with a good cooler..
so the choice still comes upto u..

[Spyder]

Oh bhai jan kya hogaya hai?

Lol what?

---------- Post added at 06:39 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:37 PM ----------

actually that doesnt bother me at all... all that matters is all the new games running at high settings. the only reason im upgrading is cause i've started facing a bottle neck with my gpu.

---------- Post added at 06:05 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:04 PM ----------



seems interesting, lets see if someone can confirm this over clocking on stock cooling... yes the optimization is the main reason im considering ivy bridge.

---------- Post added at 06:07 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:05 PM ----------

lets make things a little more clear. my budget permits me to get n ivy i5 with stock cooling lets say i oc it to abt 4ghz maybe more (stable) or i get a used sandy i5 with a cooler and oc to say somewhere near 5ghz. which will deliver better performance?

The Ivy will. The 3570K at stock outperforms a 2600K. So at 4 GHz you can do the math. Don't go for clock speeds you will be mis lead in this game.

[GhaniKhan]

that doesnt make sense. i wont be oc ing the ivy bridge cause i wont have cash left over for the cooler in that option.

---------- Post added at 02:52 PM ---------- Previous post was at 02:51 PM ----------

btw PST is pakistan standard time o.0

Yes then u r Good
and i know PST is for Pak Standard Time but i mostly write PST for Pakistan...

[AbbY]

Lol what?

---------- Post added at 06:39 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:37 PM ----------



The Ivy will. The 3570K at stock outperforms a 2600K. So at 4 GHz you can do the math. Don't go for clock speeds you will be mis lead in this game.

That's a wrong generalization. The 2600k will surely outperform the 3570k clock to clock in any application that makes use of the extra threads.

[hasanJ]

Lol what?

Bhai konsa i5 3570k dey raha hai 4.5Ghz on Stock Cooler?

And i dont think its a good idea to compare i7 with an i5

[frostbite90]

so ummm im guessing there's no definitive answer?

[hasanJ]

so ummm im guessing there's no definitive answer?

Nope there isnt one

Ivy Bridge is Faster Clock for Clock and consumes Less Power
Overclocking it is an entirely different matter
Its temperatures shoot up significantly with moderate increase in voltage

Sandy Bridge is a proven Overclocker and will cross 4.5Ghz towards 5Ghz on Budget Coolers easily

So far @Ali Man has bought an i5 3570k and he is claiming the same thing
More info about its Overclocking potential will be available after a few more members have bought it

[Spyder]

That's a wrong generalization. The 2600k will surely outperform the 3570k clock to clock in any application that makes use of the extra threads.

Tu ne bhe pee wi hai -____________- Will provide you benchmarks to prove my claim. Not fabricating this myself.

Bhai konsa i5 3570k dey raha hai 4.5Ghz on Stock Cooler?

And i dont think its a good idea to compare i7 with an i5

The 3rd Generation i5 3570K outperforms a 2nd Generation 2600K just like the 2nd Gen 2500K out performs a 1st gen i7 920. Why does it seem a bad idea?

---------- Post added at 07:05 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:03 PM ----------

Nevertheless thanks to Intel using 'thermal paste' inside the heat spreader on top the CPU instead of the solder flux is causing the heat issue as the 3d Tri gate technology may be better and more efficient at 22nm but needs the heat to be dissipated at a faster rate hence causing higher temps as compared to a sandy chip at 4.5+ GHz.

[hasanJ]

@Spyder Can u honestly find a Benchmark against this claim? -.-

That's a wrong generalization. The 2600k will surely outperform the 3570k clock to clock in any application that makes use of the extra threads.

The 3rd Generation i5 3570K outperforms a 2nd Generation 2600K just like the 2nd Gen 2500K out performs a 1st gen i7 920. Why does it seem a bad idea?

What kind of comparison is this?

There is an Architecture Jump between i7 920 and i5 2500K
But i5 3570k IS NOT an Architecture Jump from i7 2600K

[Spyder]

And I retract my claim of the 2600K being slower as the benchies where I checked last time have been updated.